The purpose of this article is to (i) highlight theflaws in three previously published works [3][2][7]on the worst-case response time analysis for taskswith self-suspensions and (ii) provide straightfor-ward fixes for those flaws, hence rendering the ana-lysis safe.
Download Not Available

BibTex Entry

@conference{Audsley_2018,
 author = {Audsley, {Neil Cameron} and Konstantinos Bletsas and Geoffrey Nelissen and Jian-Jia Chen and Geoffrey Nelissen and Huang, {Wen-Hung Kevin}},
 day = {1},
 doi = {10.4230/LITES-v005-i001-a002},
 language = {English},
 month = {10},
 note = {{\circledC} Konstantinos Bletsas, Wen-Hung Huang, Jian-Jia Chen, Neil Audsley, and Geoffrey Nelissen},
 pure_url = {https://pure.york.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/errata-for-three-papers-200405-on-fixedpriority-scheduling-with-selfsuspensions(ba53c6a1-3de9-4efd-a3c8-23c01fed3b87).html},
 title = {Errata for three papers (2004-05) on fixed-priority scheduling with self-suspensions},
 year = {2018}
}