We've been working on a metamodel zoo in the last 7 years and collected
hundereds of them over the years. We have a project called zooomm and
many people agreed on collaborating and various team are currently
working on that for different domains.
We have not made public advertisment about that yet, but many
discussions with many different teams in different application area.
What have been missing until now to put everything on the web, was a
good web-based collaborative infrastructure. Recently we've got some
funding to realize this infrastructure and a developer is working full
time on http://zooomm.org and http://planetmde.org using joomla.org as a
content management system. Nothing is visible yet, but this does not
mean that nothing is occuring...
Finally, as point out in various conferences we are also working on a
collaborative case study "conference management system" with models, and
so on. We collected information from various different domains about
teams working on this case stuy with their languages, models, and so on.
We have some other concrete plans. If you are interested in all that do
not hesitate to contact me.
To give the feeling of spirit in which this body of work is done have a
look at the "credit" section of planetmde.org. This is not a one-person,
one-team, one-technology, project, but on the contrary, an international
open free etc project. Just like conferences are not one-person,
one-tem, one-technology. We all are on the same planet...
Warning: the web site http://zooomm.org do not contain information and
we never made advertsment for the project. This does not mean, that
nothing is occuring. This just means, that currently we are working hard
and silently and waiting for the web infrastructure which will be
Tom Mens wrote:
> So let us try to follow the suggestion of Jordi Cabot, who volunteers
> to set up a model repository, and see where this leads us.
> Everyone that has models available that he would like to share can
> then send store these models in the public model repository,
> preferably in various formats. The model repository should allow to
> specify very clearly with which tool and in which format the models
> have been generated. (Which version of UML, which version of XMI,
> which modeling tool, and so on.) In addition, it could always be nice
> to have, next to this, a human-readable format of the models, for
> example as a collection of diagrams in pdf format.
> I suggest to link the model repository to the well-known PlanetMDE
> website. Once the model repository website is finished, I can ask
> Jean-Marie Favre to provide such a link and to make some
> advertisement for the model repository.
> Best regards,
> Tom Mens.
> P.S. Note that I attended the IDM 2006 workshop yesterday, the French
> version of MDE, and we discussed the need of such a model repository,
> and many persons were very much in favour of, and willing to
> contribute to, this repository.
> On 27 Jun 2006, at 15:45, Rodolfo Campero wrote:
>> 2006/6/27, Greg O'Keefe <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
>>> On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 00:40, Islam Essam wrote:
>>> > Does any body could help me in finding such a sw UML
>>> > design (includes Class Diagram, Sequence Diagram,
>>> > State Diagram,...) to test/verify my tool on it???
>>> I do not have a model for you Islam, sorry.
>>> But I thought I'd grab this opportunity to jump on the soap-box again
>>> and say: We need a library of models!
>>> This would be point of comparison for different tools and approaches.
>>> Some of you might know about TPTP (thousands of problems for theorem
>>> provers) which is enormously useful to the automated theorem proving
>>> people. Linguists have huge databases ("corpus") of text. The famous
>>> model transformation example (classes -> database schema) was really
>>> useful in this way.
>>> I have considered entering a sample of the toy models found in the UML
>>> formalisation literature into EMF/UML2, which might be a useful
>>> beginning. It would be much better to obtain some real-life models
>>> industry though.
>>> Anyone interested?
>> Me too I consider it would be very useful to have a set of model
>> samples, ranging from toy to industrial / real-life complexity.
>> I maintain a library for manipulating UML 2.0 models with
>> serialization to XMI 2.1, and the lack of samples is a drawback,
>> because several problems (mostly related to XMI) are detected by users
>> when they try to consume models exported with other tools. Having a
>> set of models available would help avoid this kind of problems.
>> I also agree with D H. Akehurst:
>> regarding that the models should be available in several formats (all
>> versions of XMI and other formats) whenever possible.
>> To remove yourself from this list please mail puml-list-
>> with a message containing the word "unsubscribe".
> To remove yourself from this list please mail
> with a message containing the word "unsubscribe".
Jean-Marie Favre http://www-adele.imag.fr/~jmfavre
Received on Wed 28 Jun 2006 - 09:42:44 BST