Re: self describing MOF?



Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Laurence Tratt (laurie@tratt.net)
Date: Wed 21 Apr 2004 - 13:09:56 BST


On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:24:35AM +0200, Alexander Rupsch wrote:

Dear Alexander,

>> One thing to bear in mind is that in the upcoming 2.0 standards, political
>> fudgery has split MOF into EMOF and CMOF which further muddies already
>> murky waters.
> Can you explain why that is so?

I don't think it's any big secret that a Very Large Company is happy that
EMOF is a very close match to the metamodel in one of their tools.

Yours,


Laurie
-- 
http://tratt.net/laurie/

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view