backward compatibility metamodel UML 2.0



Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Ragnhild Van Der Straeten (rvdstrae@vub.ac.be)
Date: Tue 20 Jan 2004 - 13:57:49 GMT


I studied the Common Behaviours and Interactions chapters of the UML 2.0
Superstructure document.
I noticed that meta classes like Stimulus, Link, AttributeLink,
Instance,... are not included anymore in the meta model of UML 2.0. I
wonder which meta classes of the meta model of UML 2.0 represent these
concepts. After all, UML 2.0 is backward compatible with previous
versions...
 
Kind regards,
 
Ragnhild
 
 
Ragnhild Van Der Straeten
System and Software Engineering Lab (SSEL)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
Email: rvdstrae@vub.ac.be 
 

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view