Re: Sets and bags / Identity of a link



Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Dirk Riehle (riehle@inf.ethz.ch)
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:48:06 +0100 (MET)


> R> In my understanding, there can be links without association. > > That's fine, but the UML1.4beta semantics document doesn't agree with you! > That's exactly the point: it sounds as though you have a consistent view > that by association you mean what I called static association, and if the > whole UML world consistently meant this we'd be fine, but it doesn't. I'm sorry, you are right. I looked up the spec to see this. Having links without associations is one of the changes we made in our implementation to resolve what we believe are inconsistencies. Dirk


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view