Re: Sets and bags / Identity of a link



Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Perdita Stevens (Perdita.Stevens@dcs.ed.ac.uk)
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 19:40:49 +0000 (GMT)


Dirk Riehle writes: R> In my understanding, there can be links without association. That's fine, but the UML1.4beta semantics document doesn't agree with you! That's exactly the point: it sounds as though you have a consistent view that by association you mean what I called static association, and if the whole UML world consistently meant this we'd be fine, but it doesn't. Perdita -- Dr. Perdita Stevens Division of Informatics, University of Edinburgh www.dcs.ed.ac.uk/home/pxs Fax: +44 131 667 7209


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view