Re: specifying design patterns using UML



Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

Shunxiang Yang (ysx@process.buaa.edu.cn)
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 23:39:26 +0800


Hi, Dirk Thanks for your explanation. regards, ysx ----- Original Message ----- From: Dirk Riehle <dirk@riehle.org> To: <puml-list@cs.york.ac.uk> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 1:05 PM Subject: Re: specifying design patterns using UML > > > > I like a bottom-up property oriented approach as the harness it imposes > > on pattern instantiations is less strict than others I have seen. > > > >What do you mean by 'bottom-up property oriented approach'? And what does > >'others' mean? Would you please explain this sentence in detail? > > This is obviously a pragmatic rather than a formal sentence :-) > > - bottom-up as in property-oriented > > - property-oriented as in specifying individual key properties rather than > providing an overarching structural specification > > - harness as in notoriously underspecifying. It is important that a > specification mechanism acknowledges the underspecification of what it is > expressing > > Dirk > > > > > To remove yourself from this list please mail puml-list-request@cs.york.ac.uk > with a message containing the word "unsubscribe".


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view