Workload - Private Study - Assessment - Description - Learning Outcomes - Content - Teaching Materials - Recommended Books
| Module Code | 0630390 |
|---|---|
| Lecturers | Alistair Edwards, Daniel Franks, Jeremy Jacob, Stefano Pirandola |
| Taken By | CSSE 3, MEng CSSE 3, MEng CSAI 3, MEng CSBES 3, MEng CSESE 3 |
| Number of Credits | 10 |
| Part | A+B |
| Teaching | Aut/2-5 |
| Open Assessments |
[90%] Computer Science Writing: Aut/5/Wed -> Spr/3/Wed Feedback: Spr/7/Wed [10%] Presentation: Spr/4/Mon -> Spr/4/Fri Feedback: Spr/8/Wed |
This module is mandatory for all 3rd year MEng students. The taught part of the module is mandatory for CS undergraduate students taking a project.
The assessment (MEng third years) is a short literature review paper. It is suggested that this is written in two phases, with the student's supervisor commenting on the first draft. Lit review (assessed) preparation - 30 hours. Final version of assessment - 10 hours. After the written assessment, there will be a short, assessed presentation. For third years other than MEng students, there is a practical session in which each student will give a presentation - these presentations are not assessed but will receive feedback. The topic should be related to project (PR3 or PR4) literature review, and should require about 5 hours' preparation.
Study requirements depend largely on the student's written English and presentation skills. The estimates for a student with average English skills are. Text preparation skills - 20 hours. Assessed presentation, and its preparation - 10 hours.
The MEng third-year students do an open assessment comprising a literature review, following specified constraints, and a marked presentation related to the literature review. There are strict guidelines. Failure to adhere to the guidelines is deprecated and will lose (many) marks.
Written feedback is given on the presentations students make as part of CSW, whether they form part of the assessment (for MEng 3rd year students) or not (for all other students).
CSW is taken in full by MEng third years students. Lectures are taken by all other third years doing CS projects. Lectures run in the first half of the Autumn term; timing of the presentations (MEng, Spring term; non-MEng, Autumn term) is to be determined. The aim is to help students prepare large extended documents, particularly project reports. For many students, the third- or fourth-year project is the first time that they have had to prepare and present a large piece of descriptive writing. Coverage is oriented to the specific projects undertaken by these students (PR3, PR4) and to MEng projects and assessment needs. Projects are assessed primarily on a report; students need to be able to present their work appropriately, setting it context, and evaluating their results, their approach and their contribution. The module also covers:
•Using LaTeX (presented by JLJ)
•planning, drafting, and how to use a supervisor
•project method, and its write-up
•report structure and content
•academic style, including referencing
•selecting and using literature
•tips on giving a presentation
•ethical issues in projects (presented by ADNE)
At the end of the module, students should:
•be able to make an informed choice of text preparation facilities, and use these to present written text clearly and accurately;
•understand the difference between draft and final copy;
•be able to use literature effectively, including appropriate citation styles and constructing a critique;
•prepare and give a presentation on an academic subject, in a fixed time;
•understand how ethical issues may be relevant to projects, and how to ensure that project work is carried out ethically.
What is a project? (1 or 2 lectures)
•Project definitions and rationale
•Content
•Guidelines and how to use them
•Planning and executing a plan
•Motivating and justifying
Methods and Approaches (2 lectures, including Scientific Method (DWF))
Text preparation facilities (1 lecture on latex (JLJ))
•Text preparation software
•Style and presentation issues
•Referencing and citation styles
Writing for Engineers and Scientists (1 lecture)
•Drafting and revising
•Removing ambiguity and waffle
•Using appendices
•Proof-reading and checking
Doing a Literature review (1 or 2 lectures)
•Reading and noting
•Critical review
•Sources and searches
Giving a presentation (1 lecture + 1 seminar)
•Content
•Style
•Timing
•Don't panic
After the session on presentation, undergraduate students will each prepare a short (unassessed) presentation. The presentation will be presented to a small group of the students, which will then discuss the presentations. Each group will be scheduled an hour in a meeting room. A demonstrator will supervise each session.
Powerpoint/pdf slides. NB further books may be suggested in lectures.
| Rating | Author | Title | Publisher | Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ** | E. Gowers | The complete plain words | Penguin | 1987 |
| ** | Helmut Kopka and P.W. Daly | A guide to LATEX : document preparation for beginners and advanced users, 3rd edn | Addison-Wesley | 1999 |
| ** | Justin Zobel | Writing for computer science, 2nd edn | Springer | 2004 |
| ** | M. Manser and S. Curtis | The Penguin writer's manual | Penguin | 2002 |
| ** | R.L. Trask | Mind the gaffe: the Penguin guide to common errors in English | Penguin | 2002 |
| ** | R.L. Trask | The Penguin guide to punctuation | Penguin | 1997 |
| ** | Colin Neville | The complete guide to referencing and avoiding plagiarism (2nd ed) | McGraw Hill | 2010 |
| * | Lynne Truss | Eats, shoots & leaves: the zero tolerance approach to punctuation | Profile Books | 2003 |
| +++ | Christian Dawson | Projects in Computing and Information Systems | Addison-Wesley | 2005 |
| + | David R. Wilkins (copyrighted) | Getting Started with LaTeX, 2nd edn | http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dwilkins/LaTeXPrimer | 1995 |
Last updated: 15th December 2011