Safety-Critical Mailing List Archive 2000
By Author

• A.R. Lawrence
  • Re: "Software fault forces Ford recall" Thu, 14 Dec 2000 21:00:01 +0000
• ABARTOLI
  • Re: Probability of "bit-toppling" in SRAMs Fri, 18 Aug 2000 10:31:36 -0400
  • RE: Probability of "bit-toppling" in SRAMs Fri, 18 Aug 2000 09:40:04 -0400
  • RE: safety qualified screen building tool Mon, 10 Jul 2000 15:32:26 -0400
• actribbl(at)collins.rockwell.com
  • Re: Safety Survey Mon, 21 Aug 2000 08:25:34 -0500
  • Re: Probability of "bit-toppling" in SRAMs Fri, 18 Aug 2000 08:43:34 -0500
  • Re: Safety Survey Wed, 17 May 2000 14:17:37 -0500
  • Safety Survey Thu, 11 May 2000 09:14:01 -0500
• Alan Banks
  • IEC 61511 Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:49:07 -0400
• Alena Griffiths
  • correct citation for safety standards Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:11:48 +1100
• Andreas Gerstinger
  • Resources Sun, 30 Jul 2000 22:49:23 +0200
• Andrew Davies
  • Proof of absence of run time errors Mon, 26 Jun 2000 22:00:34 +0100
• Andy Ashworth
  • RE: Navy carrier to run Win 2000 Wed, 20 Sep 2000 12:19:09 +0100
  • RE: Whether CS has "failed" SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 13:42:07 +0100
  • RE: Whether CS has "failed" SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 11:11:18 +0100
  • RE: Definition of Hazard Mon, 28 Feb 2000 14:13:43 -0000
• Ann Wrightson
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Mon, 21 Feb 2000 16:21:45 +0000
  • Re: Definition of Hazard Fri, 18 Feb 2000 16:54:04 +0000
  • Re: Definition of Hazard Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:29:59 +0000
• Armstrong, Jim
  • RE: Code coverage Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:19:58 +0100
  • RE: SILs, measurement of product and process Fri, 8 Sep 2000 18:47:43 +0100
  • RE: SIL of software Thu, 7 Sep 2000 12:34:31 +0100
  • RE: Ambiguity of ALARP Thu, 7 Sep 2000 11:12:03 +0100
  • RE: Ambiguity of ALARP Wed, 6 Sep 2000 10:12:15 +0100
  • RE: Ambiguity of ALARP Tue, 5 Sep 2000 16:46:01 +0100
  • RE: Ambiguity of ALARP Tue, 5 Sep 2000 15:34:21 +0100
  • Ambiguity of ALARP Mon, 4 Sep 2000 12:29:27 +0100
  • RE: USS Yorktown Incident Tue, 9 May 2000 09:59:18 +0100
  • USS Yorktown Incident Tue, 9 May 2000 09:05:05 +0100
  • RE: The cost of being in the SOUP Thu, 9 Mar 2000 13:32:24 -0000
  • RE: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Wed, 8 Mar 2000 18:44:45 -0000
  • RE: The cost of being in the SOUP Wed, 8 Mar 2000 18:29:57 -0000
  • RE: The liabilities of being in the SOUP (safety) Wed, 8 Mar 2000 17:34:31 -0000
  • What Price Safe SOUP ? Fri, 25 Feb 2000 18:41:32 -0000
  • RE: COTS, SOUP, and Standards Thu, 17 Feb 2000 12:59:43 -0000
  • COTS, SOUP, and Standards Thu, 10 Feb 2000 13:11:09 -0000
• Arthur M III Dowell
  • Re: Self drive cars Tue, 17 Oct 2000 15:39:09 -0400
• Baal, Joep van
  • Interesting link Wed, 29 Mar 2000 08:43:20 +0200
• Bahadur Sihota
  • Abbreviation "TOR" used in Def Stan 00-56, Part 2, Annex C Tue, 21 Nov 2000 10:27:10 -0500
  • safety qualified screen building tool Thu, 6 Jul 2000 08:25:51 -0400
• Bertrand Ricque
  • RE: Safety clauses in SW licenses Fri, 6 Oct 2000 22:27:33 +0200
  • RE: SIL classification problems Thu, 28 Sep 2000 14:00:53 +0200
  • RE: SIL classification problems Wed, 27 Sep 2000 18:04:58 +0200
• Bev Littlewood
  • Re: low demand systems. Mon, 9 Oct 2000 09:42:31 +0000
  • Re: Intelligent Systems Fri, 29 Sep 2000 15:07:44 +0000
  • RE: SIL of software Wed, 13 Sep 2000 10:37:51 +0000
  • Re: SILs, measurement of product and process Sat, 9 Sep 2000 10:24:28 +0000
  • Re: SILs, measurement of product and process Fri, 8 Sep 2000 19:12:11 +0000
  • Re: SILs, measurement of product and process Fri, 8 Sep 2000 15:02:13 +0000
  • Re: SILs, measurement of product and process Fri, 8 Sep 2000 11:41:35 +0000
  • RE: SILs, measurement of product and process Fri, 8 Sep 2000 11:04:00 +0000
  • Re: Ambiguity of ALARP Wed, 6 Sep 2000 11:39:41 +0000
  • Re: Ambiguity of ALARP Tue, 5 Sep 2000 12:07:10 +0000
• bill black
  • RE: legal status of IEC 61508 Wed, 29 Nov 2000 18:59:59 -0000
  • RE: legal status of ICE 61508 Wed, 29 Nov 2000 09:47:54 -0000
  • RE: low demand systems. Sun, 8 Oct 2000 20:06:24 +0100
  • RE: SILs Fri, 6 Oct 2000 11:05:35 +0100
  • RE: SILs Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:50:47 +0100
  • RE: SILs Thu, 5 Oct 2000 09:40:37 +0100
  • RE: SIL classification problems Thu, 28 Sep 2000 09:32:12 +0100
  • RE: safety qualified screen building tool Fri, 7 Jul 2000 10:58:17 +0100
  • RE: IEC 61508 & IEC 61511 STATUS Wed, 31 May 2000 09:19:48 +0100
  • RE: Risk Reduction and Maintenance Overrides Thu, 11 May 2000 09:21:13 +0100
  • RE: IEC61508 Type A and B Sub System Examples Mon, 3 Apr 2000 18:42:02 +0100
  • RE: Vacancies Tue, 15 Feb 2000 12:15:15 -0000
  • RE: When is a software tool safety-related? Mon, 10 Jan 2000 20:15:42 -0000
• BLAKELEY Anne
  • Operating Systems Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:15:45 +0100
• Braband Jens
  • AW: correct citation for safety standards Thu, 3 Feb 2000 13:39:16 +0100
• Brian Jepson
  • RE: Notes on a Workshop - The definition of hazard Fri, 28 Jul 2000 13:57:00 +0000
  • Re: Notes on a Workshop - The definition of hazard Thu, 27 Jul 2000 11:08:11 +0000
• brian wichmann
  • Re: Java versus Ada for safety critical command and control application Wed, 29 Nov 2000 22:41:43 +0000
  • Re: Extent to which IEC 61508 is "binding" Wed, 29 Nov 2000 22:41:54 +0000
  • Standards Wed, 29 Nov 2000 18:04:42 +0000
  • Re: Addendum to my last message Wed, 29 Nov 2000 17:51:12 +0000
  • Re: IEC 61511-1 Mon, 27 Nov 2000 18:50:03 +0000
  • IEC 61511-1 Sat, 25 Nov 2000 15:29:02 +0000
  • Code coverage Thu, 28 Sep 2000 13:14:56 +0100
  • RE: SILs, measurement of product and process Tue, 12 Sep 2000 09:56:47 +0100
  • Re: IEE Tutorial on "The use of Ada in real- Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:25:48 GMT
  • Re: When is a software tool safety-related? Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:44:40 GMT
• by way of Jonathan Moffett
  • RE: When is a software tool safety-related? Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:43:55 +0000
• Cant, Tony
  • . Web Site for Australian Safety Standard Def (Aust) 5679 Wed, 16 Feb 2000 11:37:42 +1030
• Charles Waite
  • Re: When is a software tool safety-related? Mon, 10 Jan 2000 22:24:56 -0500
• chris.jacquier(at)hse.gsi.gov.uk
  • Re: Ambiguity of ALARP Tue, 5 Sep 2000 9:59:57 +0100
• Chuan-Chung Chen
  • RE: safety qualified screen building tool Fri, 7 Jul 2000 18:04:22 +0800
  • RE: safety qualified screen building tool Fri, 7 Jul 2000 10:17:15 +0800
• Chuck Weinstock
  • Deadline Extension - ISW-2000 Wed, 26 Jul 2000 15:17:02 -0400
  • Third Information Survivability Workshop (ISW-2000) Wed, 26 Jul 2000 14:49:28 -0400
  • Safety Related: FastAbstracts at ICDSN Tue, 8 Feb 2000 13:00:21 -0500
• Cockram, Trevor J
  • RE: Human Factors and Safety Critical Systems Fri, 14 Jan 2000 08:49:02 -0000
  • RE: Safety of ASICs Tue, 4 Jan 2000 08:51:07 -0000
• Courtois Pierre-Jacques
  • European nuclear regulator software experts' report Mon, 13 Nov 2000 13:29:37 +0100
• daren.m.keates(at)westsig.co.uk
  • RE: safety qualified screen building tool Fri, 7 Jul 2000 09:37:49 +0100
• Darren Buttle
  • Floating point Fri, 22 Sep 2000 11:12:43 +0100 (BST)
• David Tombs
  • Re: SILs Thu, 05 Oct 2000 17:05:52 +1000
  • Re: The cost of being in the SOUP Thu, 09 Mar 2000 18:23:33 +1000
• david.h.smith(at)gecm.com
  • Re: Definition of Hazard Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:48:06 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Definition of Hazard Mon, 28 Feb 2000 10:05:51 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Definition of Hazard Mon, 28 Feb 2000 09:47:32 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: When is a software tool safety related? Wed, 12 Jan 2000 12:15:52 +0100 (CET)
• Des Nutt
  • Re: Status of IEC 61508 Tue, 28 Nov 2000 04:37:37 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: IEC 61511-1 Sun, 26 Nov 2000 09:01:46 -0800 (PST)
  • RE: SILs (safety) Thu, 5 Oct 2000 05:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
  • RE: Is cost-benefit analysis itself "irrational"? [safety] Fri, 8 Sep 2000 01:18:45 -0700 (PDT)
  • RE: safety qualified screen building tool Fri, 7 Jul 2000 00:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
  • RE: Risk Reduction and Maintenance Overrides Thu, 11 May 2000 00:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Risk Reduction and Maintenance Overrides Mon, 8 May 2000 23:57:01 -0700 (PDT)
  • Risk Reduction and Maintenance Overrides Mon, 8 May 2000 05:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
  • History of IEC 61508 Thu, 6 Apr 2000 00:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
  • IEC61508 Type A and B Sub System Examples Mon, 3 Apr 2000 09:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
  • IEC61508 Training Mon, 27 Mar 2000 23:32:35 -0800 (PST)
• Dewi Daniels
  • RE: Notes on a Workshop Thu, 27 Jul 2000 17:24:05 +0100
  • RE: MIL-STD-882C vs. MIL-STD-882D Thu, 13 Apr 2000 14:50:10 +0100
• DLSF Systems Inc.
  • Safety-Critical News Group Thu, 05 Oct 2000 14:10:17 +0100
• Dr. William Goble
  • Re: Resources Mon, 31 Jul 2000 06:50:42 -0400
  • Safety Integrity Level Selection Course Fri, 28 Jul 2000 07:55:52 -0400
  • Re: safety qualified screen building tool Thu, 06 Jul 2000 09:43:51 -0400
• E. Douglas Jensen
  • RE: SILs, measurement of product and process Fri, 8 Sep 2000 09:28:45 -0400
  • RE: Is cost-benefit analysis itself "irrational"? [safety] Thu, 7 Sep 2000 12:44:25 -0400
  • RE: Ambiguity of ALARP Thu, 7 Sep 2000 09:52:09 -0400
  • RE: Notes on a Workshop - The definition of hazard Mon, 31 Jul 2000 08:15:48 -0400
• Elmar Maas
  • Probability of "bit-toppling" in SRAMs Fri, 18 Aug 2000 14:15:09 +0200 (MEST)
• Felix Redmill
  • Help a student? Thu, 21 Sep 2000 19:53:51 +0000
  • RE: Notes on a Workshop - The definition of hazard Fri, 28 Jul 2000 14:52:00 +0000
  • Notes on a Workshop Wed, 26 Jul 2000 06:56:09 +0000
  • Re: Safety Definitions Wed, 1 Mar 2000 08:47:20 +0000
  • Re: Safety Definitions Tue, 29 Feb 2000 22:24:24 +0000
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Wed, 23 Feb 2000 15:53:44 +0000
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Tue, 22 Feb 2000 16:17:33 +0000
  • Re: Definition of Hazard Sun, 20 Feb 2000 11:20:18 +0000
  • RE: Human Factors and Safety Critical Systems Mon, 17 Jan 2000 22:49:50 +0000
  • Re: Human Factors and Safety Critical Systems Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:37:26 +0000
• G.F.
  • (no subject) Thu, 24 Aug 2000 12:52:35 -0400
• Ganter, John H
  • Java license disclaims use in hazardous environments Thu, 30 Nov 2000 11:35:41 -0700
  • J-code generators: are the Silver Bullets here? Wed, 29 Nov 2000 16:30:52 -0700
  • RE: Self drive cars -- Police van story Tue, 17 Oct 2000 09:48:16 -0600
  • Safety clauses in SW licenses Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:30:28 -0600
  • RE: Navy carrier to run Win 2000 Fri, 29 Sep 2000 11:38:13 -0600
  • Navy carrier to run Win 2000 Tue, 19 Sep 2000 11:54:44 -0600
  • RE: Is cost-benefit analysis itself "irrational"? [safety] Thu, 7 Sep 2000 13:15:44 -0600
  • Call for Papers: Fifth IEEE International Symposium on High Assur ance Systems Engineering Mon, 10 Jan 2000 15:03:16 -0700
• Garlington, Kennie E
  • RE: Java versus Ada for safety critical command and control appli cation Thu, 30 Nov 2000 12:34:46 -0600
  • Extent to which IEC 61508 is "binding" Wed, 29 Nov 2000 14:30:32 -0600
  • RE: Code coverage Thu, 28 Sep 2000 12:53:41 -0500
  • RE: Code coverage Thu, 28 Sep 2000 12:38:19 -0500
  • RE: CS hasn't failed SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 12:06:53 -0500
  • RE: Whether CS has "failed" SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 09:40:21 -0500
  • RE: Probability of "bit-toppling" in SRAMs Sat, 19 Aug 2000 18:07:53 -0500
  • RE: MIL-STD-882C vs. MIL-STD-882D Tue, 11 Apr 2000 07:48:17 -0500
  • RE: MIL-STD-882C vs. MIL-STD-882D Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:57:14 -0500
  • RE: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling Mon, 20 Mar 2000 14:47:07 -0600
  • RE: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Mon, 20 Mar 2000 14:21:57 -0600
  • RE: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling Thu, 16 Mar 2000 10:17:20 -0600
  • RE: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling Wed, 15 Mar 2000 14:36:57 -0600
  • RE: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Tue, 14 Mar 2000 12:48:57 -0600
  • RE: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Mon, 13 Mar 2000 11:49:39 -0600
  • RE: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Wed, 08 Mar 2000 15:58:43 -0600
  • RE: The cost of being in the SOUP Wed, 08 Mar 2000 12:54:13 -0600
  • RE: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Wed, 08 Mar 2000 12:49:45 -0600
  • RE: The cost of being in the SOUP Tue, 07 Mar 2000 16:25:23 -0600
  • RE: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Mon, 06 Mar 2000 13:41:33 -0600
  • RE: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Mon, 06 Mar 2000 09:31:16 -0600
  • RE: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Fri, 03 Mar 2000 16:51:19 -0600
  • RE: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Fri, 03 Mar 2000 15:32:12 -0600
  • RE: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Fri, 03 Mar 2000 14:19:36 -0600
  • RE: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Fri, 03 Mar 2000 13:56:17 -0600
  • RE: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Fri, 03 Mar 2000 11:37:53 -0600
  • RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Fri, 03 Mar 2000 09:28:05 -0600
  • RE: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Wed, 23 Feb 2000 12:16:35 -0600
  • RE: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:49:00 -0600
  • RE: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Tue, 22 Feb 2000 10:25:52 -0600
• Gerard Le_Lann
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:06:35 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Mon, 20 Mar 2000 20:59:34 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling Mon, 20 Mar 2000 20:43:21 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling Mon, 20 Mar 2000 20:04:17 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Mon, 20 Mar 2000 19:43:45 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling Mon, 20 Mar 2000 18:25:44 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Wed, 15 Mar 2000 19:19:25 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Tue, 14 Mar 2000 18:07:19 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Tue, 14 Mar 2000 15:57:16 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Tue, 14 Mar 2000 12:02:05 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Mon, 13 Mar 2000 19:10:17 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Mon, 13 Mar 2000 18:51:54 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Mon, 13 Mar 2000 18:30:43 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Mon, 13 Mar 2000 17:44:43 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Wed, 08 Mar 2000 19:30:07 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Wed, 08 Mar 2000 17:39:19 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Wed, 08 Mar 2000 13:19:04 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Mon, 06 Mar 2000 19:05:39 +0100
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Wed, 23 Feb 2000 13:02:40 +0100
• gfm101(at)cs.york.ac.uk
  • Re: Safety and C Wed, 23 Aug 2000 12:00:37 +0100
• Gneiting
  • Tool qualification accdg. DO-178B Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:28:40 +0200
• Gorman, Bob
  • RE: Human Factors and Safety Critical Systems Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:30:04 -0600
• gwdaughe(at)collins.rockwell.com
  • RE: Java versus Ada for safety critical command and controlapplic ation Thu, 30 Nov 2000 13:29:06 -0600
• Home
  • Win 2000- slideware Sat, 23 Sep 2000 02:30:47 +0100
  • Re: COTS, SOUP, and Standards Wed, 16 Feb 2000 23:48:19 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: When is a software tool safety-related? Mon, 10 Jan 2000 11:12:05 -0800 (PST)
• Iain Bate
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Tue, 14 Mar 2000 16:12:51 +0000
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Mon, 13 Mar 2000 18:47:30 +0000
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Thu, 09 Mar 2000 09:19:33 +0000
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Wed, 08 Mar 2000 16:57:42 +0000
  • CFP for an Industrial Session at Euromicro 2000 Conference on Real-Time Systems Tue, 07 Mar 2000 13:52:57 +0000
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Mon, 06 Mar 2000 16:21:11 +0000
  • Re: IEE Tutorial on the use of ADA in real t Fri, 03 Mar 2000 11:49:47 +0000
• iain.bate(at)cs.york.ac.uk
  • Call for papers for the 13th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems Thu, 03 Aug 2000 14:08:31 +0000
• Ian B Pirie
  • Re: Data Redundant Systems Sat, 1 Jul 2000 20:32:21 -0400
  • Re: Data Redundant Systems Fri, 30 Jun 2000 17:56:53 -0400
  • Data Redundant Systems Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:56:43 -0400
  • Probability of failure as a result of testing Wed, 31 May 2000 16:55:39 -0400
  • MIL-STD-882C vs. MIL-STD-882D Mon, 10 Apr 2000 16:15:53 -0400
  • Safety Definitions Tue, 29 Feb 2000 13:00:14 -0500
• Ian B. Pirie
  • Re: Safety Definitions Tue, 29 Feb 2000 20:40:01 EST
• Ian.Gibson(at)Fluor.com
  • RE: Extent to which IEC 61508 is "binding" Fri, 1 Dec 2000 08:45:06 +1000
  • Re: Safety Requirement Spec template Thu, 28 Sep 2000 09:41:28 +1100
  • Re: fibre optics Tue, 23 May 2000 09:29:11 +1100
  • Re: Risk Reduction and Maintenance Overrides Thu, 11 May 2000 22:10:16 +1100
• Inga-Lill Bratteby-Ribbing
  • SV: safety drafts Sat, 18 Mar 2000 20:55:06 +0100
  • (no subject) Wed, 15 Mar 2000 19:21:18 +0100
• IVEY Roy
  • RE: Alarms and their safety classification Fri, 28 Apr 2000 09:13:47 +1000
• James Bret Michael
  • IEEE Std 1228, IEEE Standard for Software Safety Plans Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
  • Self drive cars, and safety of ITS for non-specialty vehicles Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
  • safety of AHS, NRC report, etc. Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Intelligent Systems (safety of computer-controlled cars) Fri, 29 Sep 2000 17:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
  • safety of automated vehicles Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: Intelligent Systems (safety of AHS) Fri, 29 Sep 2000 15:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
  • RE: Navy carrier to run Win 2000 Fri, 29 Sep 2000 10:47:24 -0700 (PDT)
  • RE: Intelligent Systems Fri, 29 Sep 2000 10:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
  • Single Event Upsets and use of VxWorks in a safety-critical system Fri, 18 Aug 2000 10:22:07 -0700 (PDT)
• Janet.S.Flynt(at)us.ul.com
  • Distribution List Removal Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:15:27 -0400
• jdavies(at)iee.org
  • CS hasn't failed SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 07:01:49 -0700
  • RE: When is a software tool safety-related? Wed, 12 Jan 2000 04:02:03 -0800
• Jeffrey M. Voas
  • COMPASS Proceedings Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:04:04 -0500 (EST)
• Joao Batista
  • Re: Definition of Hazard Fri, 18 Feb 2000 17:12:34 -0300 (Hora padrão leste Am. Sul)
  • Re: Definition of Hazard Thu, 17 Feb 2000 17:14:22 -0300 (Hora padrão leste Am. Sul)
• Joao Batista Camargo Jr.
  • Re: Data Redundant Systems Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:06:37 -0300
• John McDermid
  • Re: "Software fault forces Ford recall" Fri, 15 Dec 2000 18:10:33 -0000
  • Re: Java versus Ada for safety critical command and controlapplication Thu, 30 Nov 2000 08:53:54 -0000
  • Re: Status of IEC 61508 Wed, 29 Nov 2000 16:21:00 -0000
  • Re: legal status of IEC 61508 Wed, 29 Nov 2000 16:12:54 -0000
  • Re: Addendum to my last message Wed, 29 Nov 2000 11:47:29 -0000
  • Re: SILs Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:17:47 +0100
  • Re: SIL classification problems Wed, 27 Sep 2000 19:22:50 +0100
  • Re: Whether CS has "failed" SE Thu, 14 Sep 2000 19:53:24 +0100
  • Re: SILs, measurement of product and process Fri, 8 Sep 2000 14:08:31 +0100
  • Re: SILs, measurement of product and process Fri, 8 Sep 2000 13:29:14 +0100
  • Re: SIL of software - 2nd try Thu, 7 Sep 2000 18:12:14 +0100
  • Re: Ambiguity of ALARP Thu, 7 Sep 2000 07:32:05 +0100
  • Re: Safety Survey Mon, 21 Aug 2000 12:05:19 +0100
  • Re: Notes on a Workshop Mon, 7 Aug 2000 14:12:31 +0100
  • Re: Safety Survey Tue, 16 May 2000 13:00:05 +0100
  • Re: MIL-STD-882C vs. MIL-STD-882D Tue, 11 Apr 2000 18:32:35 +0100
  • Re: MIL-STD-882C vs. MIL-STD-882D Mon, 10 Apr 2000 22:01:00 +0100
  • Re: The cost of being in the SOUP Thu, 9 Mar 2000 09:37:53 -0000
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Wed, 8 Mar 2000 17:44:08 -0000
  • Re: The cost of being in the SOUP Wed, 8 Mar 2000 08:05:58 -0000
  • The cost of being in the SOUP Tue, 7 Mar 2000 20:29:01 -0000
  • Re: Software Safety Courses Tue, 15 Feb 2000 07:17:41 -0000
  • Re: When is a software tool safety-related? Tue, 11 Jan 2000 07:35:38 -0000
  • Re: Safety of ASICs Wed, 5 Jan 2000 08:15:48 -0000
• John Simpson
  • Windows NT and Safety Related Applications Mon, 24 Jul 2000 16:14:58 +0100
• johnson(at)dcs.gla.ac.uk
  • Re: legal status of ICE 61508 Tue, 28 Nov 2000 16:37:31 GMT
  • Whether CS has "failed" SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 14:43:35 +0100 (BST)
  • RE: safety qualified screen building tool Tue, 11 Jul 2000 08:22:36 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Alarms and their safety classification Thu, 27 Apr 2000 17:36:08 +0100 (BST)
  • Human Error and Medical Systems (Safety Related) Fri, 11 Feb 2000 15:47:30 GMT
• Jon Hind
  • RE: Status of IEC 61508 Thu, 30 Nov 2000 11:22:07 +0000
• Jonathan Hammond
  • RE: Code coverage Fri, 29 Sep 2000 12:10:15 +0100
• Jonathan Moffett
  • "Software fault forces Ford recall" Wed, 13 Dec 2000 18:55:49 +0000
  • Re: Status of IEC 61508 Tue, 28 Nov 2000 10:15:24 +0000
  • Re: SILs, measurement of product and process Sat, 09 Sep 2000 09:38:24 +0100
  • Re: Is cost-benefit analysis itself "irrational"? Fri, 08 Sep 2000 09:54:14 +0100
  • RE: Notes on a Workshop - The definition of hazard Fri, 28 Jul 2000 16:34:02 +0100
  • Manuscript Fri, 30 Jun 2000 17:15:30 +0100
  • Safecomp 2000 - Programme + Registration Fri, 30 Jun 2000 08:53:47 +0100
  • Re: Computer system fire risks Fri, 23 Jun 2000 09:46:03 +0100
  • Re: fibre optics Mon, 22 May 2000 09:28:52 +0100
  • RE: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Tue, 21 Mar 2000 09:03:49 +0000
  • RE: When is a software tool safety-related? (NK) Wed, 12 Jan 2000 14:21:36 +0000
• joseph.g.d.ambrosio(at)delphiauto.com
  • RE: Intelligent Systems Fri, 29 Sep 2000 14:56:32 -0400
  • RE: Is cost-benefit analysis itself "irrational"? [safety] Thu, 7 Sep 2000 13:33:16 -0400
• Juan F. Rodriguez
  • Safety-critical mailing list Mon, 06 Mar 2000 09:51:06 +0000
• Ken Frith
  • RE: Code coverage Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:43:18 +0100
  • RE: Intelligent Systems Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:47:09 +0100
  • RE: Intelligent Systems Fri, 29 Sep 2000 12:20:09 +0100
  • Intelligent Systems Fri, 29 Sep 2000 11:09:35 +0100
  • UNCLASSIFIED - RE: safety qualified screen building tool Tue, 11 Jul 2000 11:14:16 +0100
  • Definition of Hazard - Air Traffic Control Mon, 21 Feb 2000 12:46:14 -0000
  • Definition of Hazard Mon, 21 Feb 2000 12:46:14 -0000
  • Definition of Hazard - Air Traffic Control Mon, 21 Feb 2000 12:15:36 -0000
• kiran rathod
  • Human Factors and Safety Critical Systems Thu, 13 Jan 2000 14:57:47 +0000
• Lars Oliefka
  • AW: Resources Mon, 31 Jul 2000 13:39:20 +0100
• Lenz, Chuck
  • Request to be added to list server Tue, 29 Feb 2000 15:30:20 +0000
• leveson(at)sunnyday.mit.edu
  • Re: J-code generators: are the Silver Bullets here? Fri, 01 Dec 2000 06:56:41 -0500
  • Addendum to my last message Wed, 29 Nov 2000 06:35:50 -0500
  • Re: legal status of ICE 61508 Wed, 29 Nov 2000 05:54:17 -0500
  • Re: legal status of ICE 61508 Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:44:59 -0500
  • Re: SILs Thu, 05 Oct 2000 07:17:40 -0400
  • Re: automated highway system demo Sat, 30 Sep 2000 07:27:08 -0400
  • Re: Intelligent Systems (safety of computer-controlled cars) Fri, 29 Sep 2000 22:46:30 -0400
  • Re: Intelligent Systems Fri, 29 Sep 2000 19:09:49 -0400
  • Re: Code coverage Thu, 28 Sep 2000 11:16:47 -0400
  • Re: SIL classification problems Thu, 28 Sep 2000 05:12:59 -0400
  • Re: SIL classification problems Thu, 28 Sep 2000 04:50:36 -0400
  • Re: SIL classification problems Wed, 27 Sep 2000 12:06:35 -0400
  • Re: Help a student? Fri, 22 Sep 2000 05:16:47 -0400
  • Re: Navy carrier to run Win 2000 Tue, 19 Sep 2000 18:29:26 -0400
  • Re: CS hasn't failed SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 13:22:52 -0400
  • Re: CS hasn't failed SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 11:50:38 -0400
  • Re: CS hasn't failed SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 11:29:31 -0400
  • Re: Whether CS has "failed" SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 08:51:42 -0400
  • Re: Whether CS has "failed" SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 08:18:39 -0400
  • Re: SILs, measurement of product and process Fri, 08 Sep 2000 11:59:09 -0400
  • Re: SILs, measurement of product and process Fri, 08 Sep 2000 08:44:50 -0400
  • Re: SILs, measurement of product and process Fri, 08 Sep 2000 08:20:10 -0400
  • Re: SILs, measurement of product and process Fri, 08 Sep 2000 07:49:52 -0400
  • Re: SILs, measurement of product and process Fri, 08 Sep 2000 06:26:24 -0400
  • Re: Is cost-benefit analysis itself "irrational"? [safety] Fri, 08 Sep 2000 06:18:45 -0400
  • Re: SIL of software (safety) Thu, 07 Sep 2000 12:35:48 -0400
  • Is cost-benefit analysis itself "irrational"? [safety] Thu, 07 Sep 2000 12:20:51 -0400
  • Re: Notes on a Workshop - The definition of hazard Thu, 27 Jul 2000 11:07:39 -0400
  • Re: Data Redundant Systems Sat, 01 Jul 2000 21:21:47 -0400
  • MC/DC testing (and safety) Sat, 10 Jun 2000 12:31:21 -0400
  • software and system safety class Wed, 03 May 2000 13:48:08 -0400
  • Re: MIL-STD-882C vs. MIL-STD-882D Mon, 10 Apr 2000 19:30:59 -0400
  • Re: The cost of being in the SOUP Thu, 09 Mar 2000 06:41:23 -0500
  • Re: IEE Tutorial on the use of ADA in real t Fri, 03 Mar 2000 06:17:14 -0500
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Tue, 22 Feb 2000 06:22:31 -0500
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Mon, 21 Feb 2000 17:32:43 -0500
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:38:30 -0500
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:30:22 -0500
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Mon, 21 Feb 2000 11:00:16 -0500
  • Re: Definition of Hazard Mon, 21 Feb 2000 07:02:41 -0500
  • Re: Definition of Hazard Sun, 20 Feb 2000 20:51:39 -0500
  • Re: Definition of Hazard Sun, 20 Feb 2000 13:45:06 -0500
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Sun, 20 Feb 2000 13:30:16 -0500
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Sat, 19 Feb 2000 07:59:21 -0500
  • Re: Software Safety Courses Tue, 15 Feb 2000 05:44:54 -0500
• Marc Pijnenburg
  • Re: SIL classification problems Thu, 28 Sep 2000 09:40:00 +0200
• Mark Werenowski
  • Re: legal status of ICE 61508 Tue, 28 Nov 2000 12:01:58 +0000
  • Re: Is cost-benefit analysis itself "irrational"? [safety] Fri, 08 Sep 2000 10:13:10 +0100
  • Re: EUROCONTROL Safety Assessment Methodology Thu, 24 Aug 2000 16:12:29 +0100
  • Freeware in Safety-Related Applications Tue, 11 Apr 2000 16:51:14 +0100
  • EUROCONTROL Safety Assessment Methodology Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:57:48 +0100
• mark.bowell(at)hse.gsi.gov.uk
  • Industrial use of safety-related expert systems Thu, 16 Nov 2000 13:15:52 +0000
  • Re: when is a tool safety-related? Tue, 11 Jan 2000 10:27:12 +0000
  • When is a software tool safety-related? Mon, 10 Jan 2000 16:54:37 +0000
• mark.coates(at)baesystems.com
  • RE: safety qualified screen building tool Tue, 11 Jul 2000 06:26:12 +0100
• Martyn Thomas
  • RE: Low demand systems Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:59:30 +0100
  • low demand systems. Sat, 7 Oct 2000 10:23:12 +0100
  • RE: SILs Thu, 5 Oct 2000 09:18:51 +0100
  • SILs Wed, 4 Oct 2000 20:51:50 +0100
  • RE: automated highway system demo Sat, 30 Sep 2000 10:07:40 +0100
  • RE: Intelligent Systems Fri, 29 Sep 2000 11:25:11 +0100
  • RE: Brian' contribution Sun, 17 Sep 2000 10:45:06 +0100
  • RE: CS hasn't failed SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 18:00:39 +0100
  • RE: Whether CS has "failed" SE Thu, 14 Sep 2000 20:20:07 +0100
  • RE: SIL of software - 2nd try (reply to nikola kanuritch) Thu, 14 Sep 2000 18:21:12 +0100
  • RE: SIL of software Wed, 13 Sep 2000 08:49:36 +0100
  • RE: ETOPS Sat, 9 Sep 2000 14:44:28 +0100
  • RE: SILs, measurement of product and process Sat, 9 Sep 2000 08:09:44 +0100
  • RE: SILs, measurement of product and process Fri, 8 Sep 2000 08:31:48 +0100
  • RE: SIL of software - 2nd try Thu, 7 Sep 2000 18:50:52 +0100
  • RE: Ambiguity of ALARP Thu, 7 Sep 2000 14:29:35 +0100
  • RE: Probability of "bit-toppling" in SRAMs Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:19:53 +0100
  • RE: Probability of "bit-toppling" in SRAMs Fri, 18 Aug 2000 14:06:11 +0100
  • RE: Notes on a Workshop - The definition of hazard Sat, 29 Jul 2000 11:29:28 +0100
  • RE: Notes on a Workshop - The definition of hazard Thu, 27 Jul 2000 20:10:36 +0100
  • RE: Notes on a Workshop Wed, 26 Jul 2000 08:53:39 +0100
  • RE: Data Redundant Systems Sat, 1 Jul 2000 13:16:38 +0100
  • RE: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Tue, 21 Mar 2000 08:14:58 -0000
  • RE: safety drafts Thu, 16 Mar 2000 08:23:58 -0000
  • RE: The cost of being in the SOUP (safety) Wed, 8 Mar 2000 09:44:26 -0000
  • RE: Definition of Hazard Mon, 21 Feb 2000 10:58:01 -0000
  • Tools and causal dependency Sat, 15 Jan 2000 17:22:33 -0000
• MCLELLAN Alexander
  • RE: IEC 61511-1 Mon, 27 Nov 2000 09:45:12 +0100
  • RE: fibre optics Tue, 23 May 2000 10:02:22 +0200
• Meine van der Meulen
  • RE: Low demand systems Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:40:37 +0100
  • Low demand systems Mon, 16 Oct 2000 20:09:29 +0200
  • Book: Definitions for hardware en software safety engineers Wed, 3 May 2000 09:45:03 +0200
• Michael.Schmidt(at)industrialrisk.com
  • RE: Java versus Ada for safety critical command and controlapplic ation Thu, 30 Nov 2000 09:23:35 -0600
  • RE: J-code generators: are the Silver Bullets here? Thu, 30 Nov 2000 09:04:17 -0600
  • RE: Java versus Ada for safety critical command and controlapplic ation Thu, 30 Nov 2000 07:55:37 -0600
  • RE: Extent to which IEC 61508 is "binding" Thu, 30 Nov 2000 07:56:56 -0600
  • RE: legal status of ICE 61508 Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:49:19 -0600
  • RE: legal status of ICE 61508 Tue, 28 Nov 2000 07:24:15 -0600
  • RE: Status of IEC 61508 Tue, 28 Nov 2000 06:52:43 -0600
• Mike Ellims
  • legal status of ICE 61508 Tue, 28 Nov 2000 10:21:19 -0000
  • RE: Intelligent Systems Fri, 29 Sep 2000 14:15:58 +0100
• Moulding, Danny
  • RE: Code coverage Thu, 28 Sep 2000 18:11:22 +0200
  • RE: Probability of "bit-toppling" in SRAMs Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:41:07 +0200
  • RE: Probability of "bit-toppling" in SRAMs Tue, 22 Aug 2000 09:54:21 +0200
• mtmiller(at)collins.rockwell.com
  • RE: legal status of ICE 61508 Wed, 29 Nov 2000 08:06:47 -0600
  • RE: legal status of ICE 61508 Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:11:46 -0600
  • Re: Self drive cars Tue, 17 Oct 2000 09:04:34 -0500
  • Re: Investigation and Reproduction of Incidents in Safety Systems Mon, 9 Oct 2000 10:24:15 -0500
  • RE: safety qualified screen building tool Tue, 11 Jul 2000 09:26:43 -0500
  • Re: safety qualified screen building tool Mon, 10 Jul 2000 10:51:21 -0500
  • Re: Data Redundant Systems Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:56:26 -0500
  • Re: Definition of Hazard Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:48:41 -0600
• Neil Audsley
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Wed, 15 Mar 2000 22:26:00 +0000
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Wed, 08 Mar 2000 21:01:09 +0000
• Neil Hudson
  • Investigation and Reproduction of Incidents in Safety Systems Sun, 8 Oct 2000 10:03:15 +0100
  • Re: Intelligent Systems Fri, 29 Sep 2000 13:40:18 +0100
  • Safety of Data Redundant Systems Mon, 3 Jul 2000 14:19:11 +0100
• Neil Storey
  • Re: "Software fault forces Ford recall" Fri, 15 Dec 2000 12:26:01 -0000
• NELEC
  • Re: When is a software tool safety-related? Wed, 12 Jan 2000 08:59:45 +0000
• Nigel Tracey
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Fri, 03 Mar 2000 18:28:51 +0000
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Fri, 03 Mar 2000 16:06:09 +0000
  • Re: IEE Tutorial on the use of ADA in real t Fri, 03 Mar 2000 11:31:25 +0000
• nikola.kanuritch(at)bae.co.uk
  • Alarms and their safety classification Thu, 27 Apr 2000 16:30:31 +0100
  • RE: When is a software tool safety-related? (NK) Wed, 12 Jan 2000 12:55:45 +0000
• nnancarrow(at)iee.org.uk
  • IEE Ninth Vacation School on Safety Crit Fri, 28 Jul 2000 9:34:52 +0000
  • Ninth Safety Critical Systems Vacation S Tue, 15 Feb 2000 11:38:39 +0000
• OLIVER Mervyn
  • RE: SILs Fri, 6 Oct 2000 09:34:47 +0200
  • Request for courses / books / information on Preliminary System S afety Assessment (PSSA) Fri, 29 Sep 2000 10:08:11 +0200
• Pat Place
  • Re: Code coverage Thu, 28 Sep 2000 11:44:27 -0400
  • Re: Code coverage Thu, 28 Sep 2000 10:51:34 -0400
• Paul Gruhn, P.E.
  • RE: Extent to which IEC 61508 is "binding" Wed, 29 Nov 2000 21:39:32 -0600
  • RE: Another question about SILs in "mixed" systems Sat, 7 Oct 2000 13:58:16 -0500
  • RE: Navy carrier to run Win 2000 Tue, 19 Sep 2000 19:50:53 -0500
  • SIL of software Wed, 6 Sep 2000 18:56:50 -0500
  • RE: safety qualified screen building tool Sun, 9 Jul 2000 12:02:14 -0500
  • RE: safety qualified screen building tool Thu, 6 Jul 2000 18:56:11 -0500
  • RE: Probability of failure as a result of testing Wed, 31 May 2000 17:29:05 -0500
  • RE: IEC 61508 & IEC 61511 STATUS Tue, 30 May 2000 20:29:36 -0500
  • RE: Risk Reduction and Maintenance Overrides Wed, 10 May 2000 18:15:45 -0500
  • RE: Risk Reduction and Maintenance Overrides Wed, 10 May 2000 18:12:55 -0500
  • RE: History of IEC 61508 Thu, 6 Apr 2000 17:31:10 -0500
  • RE: IEC61508 Type A and B Sub System Examples Mon, 3 Apr 2000 17:18:38 -0500
  • RE: When is a software tool safety-related? Mon, 10 Jan 2000 18:13:41 -0600
• paul.breslin(at)lr.org
  • RE: Safety of ASICs Thu, 6 Jan 2000 09:45:26 +0000
• PDGPM2c, Ken Mill
  • Abbreviation "TOR" used in Def Stan 00-56, Part 2, Annex C Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:00:55 -0000
• Penny John
  • Self drive cars Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:05:57 +0100
• Pete Fenelon
  • RE: legal status of ICE 61508 Tue, 28 Nov 2000 15:47:43 +0000
  • RE: legal status of ICE 61508 Tue, 28 Nov 2000 15:43:54 +0000
  • RE: legal status of ICE 61508 Tue, 28 Nov 2000 14:26:43 +0000
  • RE: Code coverage Thu, 28 Sep 2000 16:48:49 +0100
  • Re: Code coverage Thu, 28 Sep 2000 16:23:17 +0100
  • RE: Code coverage Thu, 28 Sep 2000 16:19:31 +0100
  • Re: Operating Systems Wed, 16 Aug 2000 15:45:13 +0100
  • Re: Notes on a Workshop - The definition of hazard Thu, 27 Jul 2000 17:06:53 +0100
  • Re: Notes on a Workshop - The definition of hazard Thu, 27 Jul 2000 15:30:14 +0100
  • Impressive marketspeak (Standards). Tue, 25 Jul 2000 13:55:30 +0100
  • RE: Safety of ASICs Mon, 17 Jul 2000 18:23:15 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Fri, 24 Mar 2000 17:29:43 +0000
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Wed, 23 Feb 2000 18:11:47 +0000
• Pete Mellor
  • RE: J-code generators: are the Silver Bullets here? Sat, 9 Dec 2000 16:42:01 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Is cost-benefit analysis itself "irrational"? [safety] Fri, 8 Sep 2000 14:04:22 +0100 (BST)
  • RE: SIL of software - 2nd try Thu, 7 Sep 2000 19:11:07 +0100 (BST)
  • RE: Probability of "bit-toppling" in SRAMs Wed, 23 Aug 2000 10:16:04 +0100 (BST)
  • RE: Probability of "bit-toppling" in SRAMs Sat, 19 Aug 2000 03:32:53 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: Probability of "bit-toppling" in SRAMs Fri, 18 Aug 2000 15:52:28 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: (Safety-Critical) Operating Systems Wed, 16 Aug 2000 15:29:07 +0100 (BST)
  • RE: Safety of ASICs Mon, 17 Jul 2000 17:40:02 +0100 (BST)
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Fri, 24 Mar 2000 17:06:41 GMT
  • Re: Definition of Hazard Mon, 21 Feb 2000 01:20:21 +0000 (GMT)
  • Re: Definition of Hazard Sun, 20 Feb 2000 15:45:10 GMT
• Peter Amey
  • RE: Java versus Ada for safety critical command and controlapplic ation Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:04:11 -0000
  • RE: Java versus Ada for safety critical command and controlapplic ation Thu, 30 Nov 2000 09:03:29 -0000
  • RE: Java versus Ada for safety critical command and controlapplic ation Thu, 30 Nov 2000 08:37:32 -0000
  • RE: Java versus Ada for safety critical command and control appli cation Thu, 30 Nov 2000 08:21:10 -0000
  • RE: SILs Thu, 5 Oct 2000 09:41:36 +0100
• Peter B. Ladkin
  • Re: "Software fault forces Ford recall" Fri, 15 Dec 2000 15:21:16 +0100
  • Re: Safeware Review Wed, 06 Dec 2000 12:26:01 +0100
  • Re: Java versus Ada for safety critical command and controlapplication Thu, 30 Nov 2000 15:40:33 +0100
  • Re: Java versus Ada for safety critical command and controlapplication Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:49:15 +0100
  • Re: J-code generators: are the Silver Bullets here? Thu, 30 Nov 2000 09:41:34 +0100
  • Re: Java versus Ada for safety critical command and controlapplication Wed, 29 Nov 2000 23:18:40 +0100
  • Re: legal status of IEC 61508 Wed, 29 Nov 2000 17:00:55 +0100
  • Re: IEC 61511-1 Sun, 26 Nov 2000 18:11:14 +0100
  • Re: Self drive cars Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:44:27 +0200
  • Re: SILs Fri, 06 Oct 2000 16:51:02 +0200
  • Re: SILs Fri, 06 Oct 2000 14:45:11 +0200
  • Re: EMI, TWA 800 and Safecrit 111 Thu, 05 Oct 2000 18:41:26 +0200
  • SILs Thu, 05 Oct 2000 15:13:58 +0200
  • Re: EMI, TWA 800 and Safecrit 111 Wed, 04 Oct 2000 12:42:18 +0200
  • EMI, TWA 800 and Safecrit 111 Wed, 04 Oct 2000 11:23:03 +0200
  • Re: safety of AHS Mon, 02 Oct 2000 23:16:19 +0200
  • Re: Intelligent Systems Fri, 29 Sep 2000 23:44:40 +0200
  • Re: Intelligent Systems Fri, 29 Sep 2000 15:39:15 +0200
  • Re: Code coverage Fri, 29 Sep 2000 07:55:15 +0200
  • Whether CS has "failed" SE Thu, 14 Sep 2000 10:40:56 +0100
  • Re: My talk Wed, 20 Sep 2000 21:53:34 +0200
  • Commentary from Brian Wichmann Wed, 20 Sep 2000 21:39:36 +0200
  • Re: Navy carrier to run Win 2000 Tue, 19 Sep 2000 20:44:18 +0200
  • Re: Brian' contribution Mon, 18 Sep 2000 10:43:41 +0200
  • Brian' contribution Sun, 17 Sep 2000 07:39:14 +0200
  • Re: CS hasn't failed SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 17:45:18 +0200
  • Re: CS hasn't failed SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 17:10:05 +0200
  • Re: Whether CS has "failed" SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 14:08:39 +0200
  • Re: Whether CS has "failed" SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 13:48:29 +0200
  • Re: Whether CS has "failed" SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 07:55:42 +0200
  • Re: Whether CS has "failed" SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 07:25:42 +0200
  • Re: SILs, measurement of product and process Tue, 12 Sep 2000 17:32:00 +0200
  • Re: Ambiguity of ALARP Thu, 07 Sep 2000 14:57:36 +0200
  • Re: Ambiguity of ALARP Wed, 06 Sep 2000 07:29:30 +0200
  • Re: Probability of "bit-toppling" in SRAMs Fri, 18 Aug 2000 16:09:38 +0200
  • Drat Sun, 30 Jul 2000 10:50:15 +0200
  • Re: Notes on a Workshop Mon, 31 Jul 2000 08:34:24 +0200
  • Re: Notes on a Workshop Sun, 30 Jul 2000 10:26:32 +0200
  • Re: safety qualified screen building tool Fri, 07 Jul 2000 11:25:09 +0200
  • Re: Data Redundant Systems Fri, 30 Jun 2000 17:23:09 +0200
  • The NASA Adminstrator's Interesting Belief Wed, 24 May 2000 15:35:29 +0100
  • Online guidelines Wed, 05 Apr 2000 10:21:59 +0200
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Tue, 21 Mar 2000 13:04:31 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling Thu, 16 Mar 2000 10:32:09 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling Wed, 15 Mar 2000 20:01:44 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Tue, 14 Mar 2000 11:06:19 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Tue, 07 Mar 2000 10:17:51 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Mon, 06 Mar 2000 14:22:08 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Fri, 03 Mar 2000 19:45:08 +0100
  • Re: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Fri, 03 Mar 2000 18:00:52 +0100
  • Re: IEE Tutorial on the use of ADA in real t Fri, 03 Mar 2000 14:06:39 +0100
  • Re: Safety Definitions Wed, 01 Mar 2000 10:54:53 +0100
  • Re: Definition of Hazard Wed, 23 Feb 2000 19:51:55 +0100
  • Re: Definition of Hazard Wed, 23 Feb 2000 19:09:09 +0100
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Wed, 23 Feb 2000 17:35:21 +0100
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Wed, 23 Feb 2000 17:26:30 +0100
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:52:19 +0100
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Tue, 22 Feb 2000 21:33:37 +0100
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Tue, 22 Feb 2000 21:30:08 +0100
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Tue, 22 Feb 2000 10:07:39 +0100
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Mon, 21 Feb 2000 19:19:18 +0100
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Mon, 21 Feb 2000 19:10:06 +0100
  • Re: Definition of Hazard Mon, 21 Feb 2000 17:12:28 +0100
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Mon, 21 Feb 2000 15:13:40 +0100
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Sun, 20 Feb 2000 13:13:55 +0100
  • Re: Definition of Hazard Fri, 18 Feb 2000 17:06:35 +0100
  • Definition of Hazard Thu, 17 Feb 2000 18:08:41 +0100
  • Re: When is a software tool safety-related? Fri, 14 Jan 2000 17:04:47 +0100
  • Re: When is a software tool safety-related? Wed, 12 Jan 2000 20:26:31 +0100
  • Re: When is a software tool safety-related? Wed, 12 Jan 2000 20:11:24 +0100
  • Re: When is a software tool safety-related? Wed, 12 Jan 2000 19:31:21 +0100
  • Re: When is a software tool safety-related? Wed, 12 Jan 2000 14:41:36 +0100
  • Re: When is a software tool safety-related? Wed, 12 Jan 2000 12:21:45 +0100
  • Re: Safety of ASICs Thu, 06 Jan 2000 11:49:21 +0100
  • Re: Safety of ASICs Wed, 05 Jan 2000 12:12:50 +0100
• Peter Bishop
  • Re: IEC 61508 & IEC 61511 STATUS Tue, 30 May 2000 23:17:08 +0100
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:25:38 -0000
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:47:11 -0000
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Mon, 21 Feb 2000 21:51:07 -0000
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Mon, 21 Feb 2000 21:51:07 -0000
  • Re: Definition of Hazard Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:47:05 -0000
  • Re: Definition of Hazard Fri, 18 Feb 2000 17:21:03 -0000
  • Re: When is a software tool safety-related? Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:45:52 -0000
  • Re: Safety of ASICs Fri, 7 Jan 2000 10:12:26 -0000
• Peter Croll
  • RE: legal status of ICE 61508 Wed, 29 Nov 2000 10:25:56 +1100
• Peter Lindsay
  • Australian safety critical systems workshop Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:00:16 +1000 (EST)
  • Oz safety workshop - extended deadline for papers Fri, 21 Jul 2000 18:01:27 +1000 (EST)
  • Aust safety-critical systems CFP Thu, 6 Apr 2000 09:35:56 +1000 (EST)
• pgb(at)adelard.co.uk
  • Re: Code coverage Thu, 28 Sep 2000 21:32:38 +0100
  • Re: Code coverage Thu, 28 Sep 2000 15:27:23 +0100
  • Re: SIL classification problems Thu, 28 Sep 2000 09:45:48 +0100
  • Re: Help a student? Thu, 21 Sep 2000 23:18:24 +0100
  • RE: Probability of "bit-toppling" in SRAMs Wed, 23 Aug 2000 11:59:18 +0100
  • RE: Probability of "bit-toppling" in SRAMs Tue, 22 Aug 2000 15:19:37 +0100
  • Re: Data Redundant Systems Sat, 1 Jul 2000 21:48:07 +0100
  • Re: Proof of absence of run time errors Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:35:06 +0100
  • RE: The cost of being in the SOUP (safety) Thu, 22 Jun 2000 19:44:56 +0100
  • RE: The cost of being in the SOUP (safety) Thu, 15 Jun 2000 16:37:07 +0100
• Phil Williams
  • RE: Self drive cars Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:57:10 +0100
  • RE: When is a software tool safety-related? (NK) Wed, 12 Jan 2000 14:27:12 -0000
• Pierre-jacques Courtois
  • RE: Floating point Thu, 28 Sep 2000 10:24:21 +0200
• Rachel Amkreutz
  • SIS in batch processes Mon, 20 Nov 2000 09:42:24 -0500
• Rachel Harrison
  • Applying Formal Methods Thu, 3 Feb 2000 10:03:49 GMT
• Raj Sreenevasan
  • Re: Risk Reduction and Maintenance Overrides Wed, 10 May 2000 11:52:40 +1000
  • Re: Risk Reduction and Maintenance Overrides Tue, 9 May 2000 09:28:32 +1000
  • Using DCS hardware as the Burner Management System for Pulverized Coal Fired Boilers Sat, 29 Apr 2000 21:46:12 +0100
• Robin Bloomfield
  • Vacancies Mon, 14 Feb 2000 19:37:52 -0000
• Robinson, Paul
  • RE: legal status of ICE 61508 Tue, 28 Nov 2000 14:49:52 -0000
  • RE: Self drive cars Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:17:06 +0100
• Rod Chapman
  • RE: Code coverage Thu, 28 Sep 2000 17:13:16 +0100
  • RE: Code coverage Thu, 28 Sep 2000 17:00:44 +0100
  • RE: Code coverage Thu, 28 Sep 2000 15:39:55 +0100
  • RE: Code coverage Thu, 28 Sep 2000 14:59:54 +0100
  • ANNOUNCE: new SPARK tools now available free of charge to academi c institutions Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:38:19 +0100
  • RE: Probability of "bit-toppling" in SRAMs Tue, 22 Aug 2000 16:41:15 +0100
• Ronald V Mausser
  • Java versus Ada for safety critical command and control application Wed, 29 Nov 2000 16:49:16 -0500
• ronald.weir(at)baesystems.com
  • Safety Critical Mailing List application Wed, 27 Sep 2000 12:03:33 +0100
• Ross Hannan
  • Re: Tool qualification accdg. DO-178B Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:29:38 +0100
  • Status of Annual Reports (DO-178B/ED-12B) Wed, 31 May 2000 11:29:00 +0100
  • Re: Software Safety Courses Tue, 15 Feb 2000 08:24:26 -0000
  • Software Safety Courses Mon, 14 Feb 2000 21:45:14 -0000
• ross_hannan
  • Fw: SILs, measurement of product and process Sat, 9 Sep 2000 00:46:43 +0100
  • ETOPS Sat, 9 Sep 2000 00:45:59 +0100
• Simon Carter
  • Re: USS Yorktown Incident Tue, 09 May 2000 19:01:11 +1000
• Simon Hughes
  • Safety Engineers, Leatherhead, South-East E ngland, £18-45K + benefits Wed, 15 Nov 2000 17:19:40 -0000
  • Re: paper on verif of adaptive agents Thu, 5 Oct 2000 08:54:10 +0100
  • RE: Whether CS has "failed" SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 09:17:21 +0100
  • systems safety training courses Tue, 18 Apr 2000 10:17:27 +0100
  • RE: Software Safety Courses Tue, 15 Feb 2000 10:05:02 -0000
  • APES - final project seminar on the practical application of IEC 61508 Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:19:17 -0000
  • RE: When is a software tool safety-related? Fri, 14 Jan 2000 16:19:49 -0000
  • RE: When is a software tool safety-related? Fri, 14 Jan 2000 10:55:14 -0000
  • RE: When is a software tool safety-related? Wed, 12 Jan 2000 16:42:58 -0000
• simon.brown(at)hse.gsi.gov.uk
  • Re[2]: Status of IEC 61508 Tue, 5 Dec 2000 9:45:11 +0000
  • Status of IEC 61508 Wed, 29 Nov 2000 15:47:05 +0000
  • IEC 61508 passes final IEC vote Wed, 16 Feb 2000 9:24:36 +0000
• Spiker, Rolf
  • RE: Difficult software question. Thu, 7 Dec 2000 15:24:11 +0100
  • RE: legal status of ICE 61508 Tue, 28 Nov 2000 22:39:07 +0100
  • Safety Requirement Spec template Wed, 27 Sep 2000 10:12:45 +0200
• Spriggs, John
  • RE: J-code generators: are the Silver Bullets here? Thu, 30 Nov 2000 08:51:09 -0000
  • RE: legal status of ICE 61508 Tue, 28 Nov 2000 10:38:43 -0000
  • RE: Abbreviation "TOR" used in Def Stan 00-56, Part 2, Annex C Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:00:52 -0000
  • RE: Self drive cars Tue, 17 Oct 2000 13:41:02 +0100
  • Human Rights Act Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:55:56 +0100
  • RE: Whether CS has "failed" SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 10:38:06 +0100
  • RE: Notes on a Workshop - The definition of hazard Thu, 27 Jul 2000 15:47:54 +0100
  • RE: Notes on a Workshop Wed, 26 Jul 2000 09:00:54 +0100
  • RE: Safety of ASICs Tue, 18 Jul 2000 07:35:21 +0100
  • RE: safety qualified screen building tool Fri, 7 Jul 2000 09:34:03 +0100
  • RE: safety qualified screen building tool Fri, 7 Jul 2000 08:38:39 +0100
  • RE: Data Redundant Systems Mon, 3 Jul 2000 08:29:39 +0100
  • RE: Manuscript Mon, 3 Jul 2000 08:13:36 +0100
• Spriggs,John
  • RE: fibre optics Mon, 22 May 2000 10:05:27 +0100
  • fibre optics Mon, 22 May 2000 09:25:23 +0100
  • RE: Online guidelines Wed, 5 Apr 2000 16:17:55 +0100
  • RE: RTOS Responsibilities for Scheduling (was: IEE Tutorial...) Mon, 27 Mar 2000 07:47:37 +0100
  • RE: The cost of being in the SOUP Thu, 9 Mar 2000 08:02:12 -0000
  • RE: Definition of Hazard Mon, 28 Feb 2000 10:04:29 -0000
• Steve White
  • Re: "Software fault forces Ford recall" Fri, 15 Dec 2000 07:47:14 +0000
• Steven Crook-Dawkins
  • Re: Java versus Ada for safety critical command and controlapplication Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:20:33 -0000
  • Re: Self drive cars Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:59:55 +0100
• steven dawkins
  • Re: When is a software tool safety-related? Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:29:29 +0000
• STGSSMO5, Gareth Rowlands
  • RE: Abbreviation "TOR" used in Def Stan 00-56, Part 2, Annex C Tue, 21 Nov 2000 15:57:34 -0000
• stuart.palin(at)gecm.com
  • Re: When is a software tool safety-related? Wed, 12 Jan 2000 18:26:00 +0000 (GMT)
• Tim Kelly
  • Re: Ambiguity of ALARP Wed, 06 Sep 2000 11:54:06 +0100
  • Re: Ambiguity of ALARP Tue, 05 Sep 2000 17:54:33 +0100
  • Re: Resources Wed, 02 Aug 2000 13:36:42 +0100
• Tom Anderson
  • Re: SILs, measurement of product and process Fri, 8 Sep 2000 13:02:13 +0100
• tom(at)faaconsulting.com
  • Re: Whether CS has "failed" SE Fri, 15 Sep 2000 06:57:32 -0700
  • RE: safety qualified screen building tool Mon, 10 Jul 2000 14:19:52 -0700
  • Re: Freeware in Safety-Related Applications Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:28:27 -0700
  • RE: Definition of Hazard Mon, 28 Feb 2000 04:36:04 -0800
  • Re: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Wed, 23 Feb 2000 06:09:02 -0800
  • RE: Definition of Hazard in System Safety Tue, 22 Feb 2000 14:45:40 -0800
  • RE: COTS, SOUP, and Standards Fri, 18 Feb 2000 04:25:29 -0800
  • Re: Software Safety Courses Mon, 14 Feb 2000 18:49:42 -0800
  • RE: When is a software tool safety-related? Mon, 10 Jan 2000 17:36:27 -0800
• Tony Cox
  • Computer system fire risks Thu, 22 Jun 2000 18:28:21 +0100
• Tony Foord
  • Alarms and their safety classification Mon, 1 May 2000 14:40:52 +0100
• Torok, Ray
  • RE: Human Factors and Safety Critical Systems Mon, 17 Jan 2000 09:16:17 -0800
• Tyler G Cox
  • Another question about SILs in "mixed" systems Thu, 05 Oct 2000 08:25:00 Z
  • SIL of software - 2nd try Thu, 07 Sep 2000 09:52:00 Z
• UK72
  • RE: legal status of IEC 61508 Wed, 29 Nov 2000 08:21:49 -0700
  • RE: IEC 61511-1 Tue, 28 Nov 2000 03:44:14 -0600
  • RE: SILs (safety) Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:21:55 +0100
  • RE: SILs Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:00:15 +0100
  • RE: IEC 61511 (functional safety - process control ) Mon, 17 Jul 2000 18:05:26 +0100
  • RE: IEC 61511 Fri, 14 Jul 2000 16:58:29 +0100
• Victoria Stavridou
  • Re: Status of IEC 61508 Mon, 27 Nov 2000 14:13:25 -0800
• Vijay K. Vaishnavi
  • Re: COMPASS Proceedings Fri, 24 Mar 2000 11:03:15 -0500
• WOODS, JORGE
  • RE: EUROCONTROL Safety Assessment Methodology Thu, 24 Aug 2000 15:57:02 +1000
  • References on the application of System Safety during early syste m life cycle phase Wed, 28 Jun 2000 14:26:21 +1000
• Yolanda Gonzalez
  • IEC 61508 & IEC 61511 STATUS Tue, 30 May 2000 12:54:18 +0200

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Tue 21 Aug 2001 - 16:43:13 BST