Safety-Critical Mailing List Archive 1999
By Date

• [Safety-related]: Re: Validating Critical Data Jonathan Moffett
• [Safety-related]: Re: Validating Critical Data Jonathan Moffett
• Re: Safety standards for Air Traffic Management Peter B. Ladkin
• Abstract deadline for 17th International System Safety Conference International System Safety Conf
• CFP: Pac. Rim. Int. Symp. on Dependable Computing Dr. Jogesh K. Muppala
• Safety as a system engineering issue Gerard Le_Lann
• Re: Safety as a system engineering issue Ian B Pirie
• Re: Safety as a system engineering issue Brian Wichmann
• Re: Safety as a system engineering issue Gerard Le_Lann
• Re: Safety as a system engineering issue Stuart Palin 01634 844400 Ext 3364
• Safety/Fire News-Jobs/Contest/Clipart & More ((at)WorldSafety.com) Mike
• Safety: Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification Ross Hannan
• Safety - CNS/ATM Systems Ross Hannan
• Re: Safety - CNS/ATM Systems Brian Wichmann
• Developing Fault-Tolerant (potentially safety-critical) Systems with Ada Andy Wellings
• Re: Developing Fault-Tolerant (potentially safety-critical) Systems with Ada Brian Wichmann
• Re: Developing Fault-Tolerant (potentially safety-critical) Systems with Ada Peter B. Ladkin
• Diverse software for safety Brian Wichmann
• "Final_Call:FEmSys99" Axel Poigne
• Re: Diverse software for safety Stuart Palin 01634 844400 Ext 3364
• Re: Diverse software for safety Peter B. Ladkin
• RE: Diverse software for safety Martyn Thomas
• Systematic Allocation of Safety Integrity Requirements - Workshop Announcement Braband Jens
• Industrial Safety Systems : Fit For Purpose? Des Jane Nutt
• Safety - Software error effects analysis Ian B. Pirie
• RE: Industrial Safety Systems : Fit For Purpose? John McDermid
• Call For Papers - SERTA 1999 (not specifically safety related) Iain Bate
• New version of the Dependability References Database Jonathan Moffett
• Contribution on the failure of Ariane 5 flight 501 Jonathan Moffett
• Seminar on Safety Arguments for Programmable Systems William Marsh
• Safeware: Masterclass in Software Safety Tony Foord
• North American offering of Leveson's Software Safety Class leveson(at)sunnyday.mit.edu
• typo in Safety Class announcement leveson(at)sunnyday.mit.edu
• ISESS' 99 Final Program Land, Kathy
• Paper available: "Managing Errors to Reduce Accidents in High Con sequence Networked Information Systems." Ganter, John H
• MSc in Safety Critical Systems Engineering Jonathan Moffett
• Human error and clinical systems (safety related) johnson(at)dcs.gla.ac.uk
• Faculty and research associate positions at MIT leveson(at)sunnyday.mit.edu
• suitable operating systems for safety critical systems? Alena Griffiths
• Re: suitable operating systems for safety critical systems? Peter B. Ladkin
• Re: suitable operating systems for safety critical systems? Alena Griffiths
• Re: suitable operating systems for safety critical systems? leveson(at)sunnyday.mit.edu
• Re: suitable operating systems for safety critical systems? Peter B. Ladkin
• Re: suitable operating systems for safety critical systems? Jon Davies
• Re: suitable operating systems for safety critical systems? leveson(at)sunnyday.mit.edu
• Re: suitable operating systems for safety critical systems? Felix Redmill
• Re: suitable operating systems for safety critical systems? mmcnicol(at)westsig.com.au
• European Summer School Alberto Pasquini
• RE: suitable operating systems for safety critical systems? Colin Downey
• Auditing Safety Systems against IEC 61508 Des Jane Nutt
• Auditing Safety Systems against IEC 61508 Tony Foord
• Re: Auditing Safety Systems against IEC 61508 John McDermid
• Re: Auditing Safety Systems against IEC 61508 Tony Foord
• Re: Auditing Safety Systems against IEC 61508 Steve Palmer
• Re[2]: Auditing Safety Systems against IEC 61508 Ian.Gibson(at)fluordaniel.com
• ISESS'99 Panels and Workshops Peter Poon
• Safety and C Brian Wichmann
• Re: Safety and C arocholl(at)dimetronic.es
• Returned mail: Cannot send message within 5 days Mail Delivery Subsystem
• Object Code Coverage Testing Brookshire, Jerry R
• Re: Object Code Coverage Testing John McDermid
• Job Opportunity Gorman, Bob
• technical safety vs. human safety Renpenning Frank
• RE: technical safety vs. human safety Martyn Thomas
• Job Opportunity Gorman, Bob
• New member to the list Peter Sheppard
• Re: technical safety vs. human safety Peter B. Ladkin
• Job Opportunity in SF Bay Area Gorman, Bob
• SAFETY AND YEAR 2000 Sandro Bologna
• Dependability References Database Jonathan Moffett
• HSE discussion document mark.bowell(at)hse.gov.uk
• Re: HSE discussion document Des and Jane Nutt
• Discussion on Operating Systems for Safety-Related Software Applications Jonathan Moffett
• Workshop on Organisational Aspects of Human Error and Systems Failure johnson(at)dcs.gla.ac.uk
• Competency standards document mark.bowell(at)hse.gov.uk
• Book Review: POORTVLIET, A. van, Risks, Disasters, and Management Meine van der Meulen
• DO-178B Object Code Branch Analysis .... Brookshire, Jerry R
• Re: DO-178B Object Code Branch Analysis .... Brian Wichmann
• RE: DO-178B Object Code Branch Analysis .... Brookshire, Jerry R
• Workshop on Organisational Aspects of Systems Failure Chris Johnson
• Sunday Times article Peter B. Ladkin
• Re: Sunday Times article Brian Wichmann
• Re: Sunday Times article Peter B. Ladkin
• Safety-critical education for Japanese kids Pete Mellor
• Re: Safety-critical education for Japanese kids P/ISIS 46, Mr K Geary
• Re: Safety-critical education for Japanese kids Peter B. Ladkin
• Re: Safety-critical education for Japanese kids viv.hamilton(at)gecm.com
• Re: Safety-critical education for Japanese kids Peter B. Ladkin
• JPDc Special Issue on Self-Stabilizing Distributed Systems Sajal Das
• Re: Safety-critical education for Japanese kids viv.hamilton(at)gecm.com
• Fwd: IEC61508 : Accepted for safety? Des and Jane Nutt
• HasThe Safety Industry Accepted IEC 61508 Des and Jane Nutt
• Re: HasThe Safety Industry Accepted IEC 61508 leveson(at)sunnyday.mit.edu
• RE: HasThe Safety Industry Accepted IEC 61508 Martyn Thomas
• Re: HasThe Safety Industry Accepted IEC 61508 nikola.kanuritch(at)bae.co.uk
• Re: HasThe Safety Industry Accepted IEC 61508 Ross Hannan
• Re: HasThe Safety Industry Accepted IEC 61508 Des and Jane Nutt
• Re: HasThe Safety Industry Accepted IEC 61508 leveson(at)sunnyday.mit.edu
• Re: HasThe Safety Industry Accepted IEC 61508 Joao Batista
• RE: U.S. Position on IEC 61508 dherrma2(at)csc.com
• Re: U.S. Position on IEC 61508 leveson(at)sunnyday.mit.edu
• RE: HasThe Safety Industry Accepted IEC 61508 UK72
• RE: HasThe Safety Industry Accepted IEC 61508 Paul Gruhn, P.E.
• Re: HasThe Safety Industry Accepted IEC 61508 Ian.Gibson(at)fluordaniel.com
• Re: HasThe Safety Industry Accepted IEC 61508 leveson(at)sunnyday.mit.edu
• RE: HasThe Safety Industry Accepted IEC 61508 Martyn Thomas
• Re: HasThe Safety Industry Accepted IEC 61508 leveson(at)sunnyday.mit.edu
• Australian safety critical systems workshop Brenton Atchison
• Re: The practical application of IEC 61508 Jeffrey M. Voas
• The practical application of IEC 61508 simon_hughes(at)era.co.uk
• RE: The practical application of IEC 61508 Andy Ashworth
• How does failure find a way? Ganter, John H
• Re: How does failure find a way? John McDermid
• Research job at York bcs-hci(at)mailbase.ac.uk Peter Wright
• Suitability of Operating Systems Overy, Andy
• Re: HasThe Safety Industry Accepted IEC 61508 mark.bowell(at)hse.gov.uk
• RE: Suitability of Operating Systems Phil Williams
• Re: Suitability of Operating Systems Jon Davies
• Safety and Measurement Brian Wichmann
• Re: Suitability of Operating Systems Dr. Wolfgang Ehrenberger
• New Book Announcement dherrma2(at)csc.com
• Comments by Nancy Leveson bill black
• Re: Comments by Nancy Leveson leveson(at)sunnyday.mit.edu
• RE: Comments by Nancy Leveson Garlington, Kennie E
• Re: Comments by Nancy Leveson leveson(at)sunnyday.mit.edu
• RE: Comments by Nancy Leveson bill black
• RTCA DO-178B IVEY Roy
• Re: RTCA DO-178B leveson(at)sunnyday.mit.edu
• Re: Comments by Nancy Leveson John McDermid
• Re: Comments by Nancy Leveson Ross Hannan
• Re: Comments by Nancy Leveson Dr. Wolfgang Ehrenberger
• Re: Comments by Nancy Leveson by way of Jonathan Moffett
• "where are they now?" (was RE: The practical application of IEC 61508) by way of Jonathan Moffett
• IEC61508 in aviation industry Eaton Andrew
• Re: IEC61508 in aviation industry Des and Jane Nutt
• Re: IEC61508 in aviation industry by way of Jonathan Moffett
• Re: IEC61508 in aviation industry Ross Hannan
• Re: IEC61508 in aviation industry Peter B. Ladkin
• Re: IEC61508 in aviation industry Bev Littlewood
• Re: IEC61508 in aviation industry leveson(at)sunnyday.mit.edu
• Re: IEC61508 in aviation industry Dr. Wolfgang Ehrenberger
• Re: IEC61508 in aviation industry Ross Hannan
• RE: IEC61508 in aviation industry bill black
• IR35 - What Effect on Safety? Des and Jane Nutt
• RE: IR35 - What Effect on Safety? Martyn Thomas
• Re: IR35 - What Effect on Safety? John McDermid
• Re: IEC61508 in aviation industry Bev Littlewood
• failure of protection systems viv.hamilton(at)gecm.com
• Re: failure of protection systems Peter B. Ladkin
• Re: failure of protection systems (safety-critical) Pete Mellor
• Re: failure of protection systems (safety-critical) Pete Mellor
• Re: failure of protection systems (safety-critical) Steve Palmer
• Re: failure of protection systems Juan F. Rodriguez
• A pre-emptive comment re: failure of protection systems Jonathan Moffett
• Re: failure of protection systems (safety-critical) Juan F. Rodriguez
• Re: failure of protection systems (safety-critical) Robert Hale
• Re: IEC61508 in aviation industry Peter B. Ladkin
• Re: failure of protection systems (safety-critical) Richard Bolt
• TCAS near-miss: "an error in just one wire making it 1-0-1" Ganter, John H
• Re: failure of protection systems (safety-critical) Peter B. Ladkin
• Re: failure of protection systems by way of Jonathan Moffett
• Re: failure of protection systems Juan F. Rodriguez
• IEC61508 Discussion Jonathan Moffett
• Re: IEC61508 Discussion Dr. Wolfgang Ehrenberger
• Re: IEC 61508 Discussion. Jonathan Moffett
• Some thoughts on SPADS A.R. Lawrence
• Re: Some thoughts on SPADS Juan F. Rodriguez
• RE: Some thoughts on SPADS and safety Martyn Thomas
• Re: Some thoughts on SPADS and safety Juan F. Rodriguez
• SV: Some thoughts on SPADS and safety Halvorsrud Gunhild
• Re: SV: Some thoughts on SPADS and safety Juan F. Rodriguez
• Re: Some thoughts on SPADS and safety Boyd McKillican
• IEC 61508 is not just for protection systems mark.bowell(at)hse.gov.uk
• Re[2]: Some thoughts on SPADS and safety chris.jacquier(at)hse.gov.uk
• RE: Some thoughts on SPADS and safety Martyn Thomas
• Safety ILs and ALARP Felix Redmill
• Some thoughts on SPADS Felix Redmill
• Safety Consultant Post Jon Davies
• RE: Some thoughts on SPADS and safety Peter Bishop
• Re: Some thoughts on SPADS - ILS Explanation by way of Jonathan Moffett
• RE: Some thoughts on SPADS Peter Sheppard
• Fail safe and feasibility of changes Juan F. Rodriguez
• Thanks - ILS Explanation Juan F. Rodriguez
• RE: Some thoughts on SPADS Peter Sheppard
• RE: Some thoughts on SPADS Cockram, Trevor J
• Re: Fail safe and feasibility of changes Jon Davies
• SV: SV: Some thoughts on SPADS and safety Halvorsrud Gunhild
• Re: Fail safe and feasibility of changes Juan F. Rodriguez
• RE: Safety ILs and ALARP Paul Gruhn, P.E.
• RE: Some thoughts on SPADS - ILS Explanation Paul Gruhn, P.E.
• RE: Safety ILs and ALARP Felix Redmill
• Re: Safety ILs and ALARP John McDermid
• RE: Safety ILs and ALARP Paul Gruhn, P.E.
• Re: Safety ILs and ALARP Mark Werenowski
• Safety Posts Braband Jens
• RE: Safety ILs and ALARP bill black
• RE: Safety ILs and ALARP Peter Sheppard
• Re: Safety ILs and ALARP Tim Kelly
• RE: Safety ILs and ALARP bill black
• RE: Safety ILs and ALARP nikola.kanuritch(at)bae.co.uk
• RE: Safety ILs and ALARP Paul Gruhn, P.E.
• RE: Safety ILs and ALARP Neil J. Robinson
• RE: Safety ILs and ALARP bill black
• Re: Safety ILs and ALARP Tim Kelly
• Re: Safety ILs and ALARP Peter B. Ladkin
• RE: Safety ILs and ALARP Felix Redmill
• RE: Safety ILs and ALARP Paul Gruhn, P.E.
• RE: Safety ILs and ALARP Neil J. Robinson
• RE: Safety ILs and ALARP bill black
• Re: Safety ILs and ALARP leveson(at)sunnyday.mit.edu
• RE: Safety ILs and ALARP Penny John
• RE: Safety ILs and ALARP Felix Redmill
• RE: Safety ILs and ALARP Dewi Daniels
• Re: Safety ILs and ALARP Tim Kelly
• Re: Safety ILs and ALARP viv.hamilton(at)gecm.com
• Vehicle accident investigation story Ganter, John H
• Vehicle accident investigation story: Better format Ganter, John H
• ALARP, cost-benefit calculations, etc. Simon Hughes
• Re: ALARP, cost-benefit calculations, etc. Brian Wichmann
• Re: ALARP, cost-benefit calculations, etc. John McDermid
• Re: ALARP, cost-benefit calculations, etc. Felix Redmill
• Re: ALARP, cost-benefit calculations, etc. Juan F. Rodriguez
• RE: ALARP, cost-benefit calculations, etc. Peter Sheppard
• Re: ALARP, cost-benefit calculations, etc. John McDermid
• RE: ALARP, cost-benefit calculations, etc. Simon Hughes
• Safety information resources Jonathan Moffett
• Re: Safety information resources Peter Bishop
• Re: Safety information resources leveson(at)sunnyday.mit.edu
• Re: Safety information resources Juan F. Rodriguez
• Re: Safety information resources leveson(at)sunnyday.mit.edu
• Re: Safety information resources Peter Bishop
• Re: Safety information resources Jonathan Moffett
• RE: Safety information resources Ian Wand
• RE: Safety information resources Brian Wichmann
• Digest of discussion on IEC 61508 Jonathan Moffett
• Safety assessment of Legacy Code IVEY Roy
• Re: Safety assessment of Legacy Code John McDermid
• company policies addressing product safety for companies based outside the U.K. Mark Werenowski
• Re: company policies addressing product safety for companies based outsidethe U.K. Peter B. Ladkin
• safety - HAZOP video Mark Nicholson
• Update to Digest of discussion on IEC 61508 Jonathan Moffett
• Call for Papers: Factory Communication Systems Iain Bate
• NTSB heavily criticised (safety related) johnson(at)dcs.gla.ac.uk
• Safety of ASICs John McDermid
• Safety of ASICs PS John McDermid
• RE: Safety of ASICs Peter Sheppard
• Re: Safety of ASICs John McDermid
• RE: Safety of ASICs Peter Sheppard
• Re: Safety of ASICs John McDermid
• Re: Safety of ASICs Neil Audsley

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Tue 21 Aug 2001 - 16:21:47 BST