Modular MSc Course Projects - Frequently Asked Questions
This page contains general advice on how to approach the project that is set for Modular MSc and related courses. The advice is presented as a set of frequently asked questions with appropriate responses, and is organised into the following sections:
Q1: When should I start thinking about a project?
A1: The best advice we can give is:
Q2: How should I go about selecting a project?
A2: Consider the following:
Q3: What
sort of project can I select?
A3: Essentially these come into 2 categories
Q4: What
if the material in my case study is commercial in confidence or subject to the
official secrets act?
A4: There is precedent for
"sanitising" (i.e. hiding commercially or security-sensitive detail)
where necessary. In the ultimate case we can make the project not publically
available. Where possible we will strive to avoid the latter case.
Q5:
What are the milestones during my project period?
A5:
For a part-time student the following is required:
1. Provide a written summary of progress to
your supervisor on the first Monday of each month during their project. You may
post, fax or e-mail it to your supervisor.
2. Draft literature review at 4 months and
first full version of the literature review at 6 months (normally October)
3. Draft statement of progress at 9 months,
including an outline of the final dissertation. (normally early January)
4. Attend
1. Start of Project: Literature review
2. +9 months: Mid-project report
3. +15 months: Final write-up
5. More guidance can be found in the briefing for
students starting their project and on the department’s projects web
pages.
Q6: What format should I use for references?
A6: Any sensible citation style is acceptable. The "classic" formats are "Numbered" and "Author/Date". In the "Numbered" format, references in the text appear as [12]. In the bibliography, papers are listed numerically in order of appearance in the body of the answer. In the "Author/Date" format, references in the text appear as [Lowson 2001]. If you cite more than one paper publised by the same author in a single year, you use [Lowson 2001a], [Lowson 2001b] etc. If you adopt this style, when you cite a reference, you need not repeat the author's name or authors' names ("Lowson [Lowson 2001] has shown ..."). Write instead: "Lowson [2001] has shown ...". In the bibliography, papers are listed alphabetically by first author.
Q7: A lot of the material I have put together reflects what already exists on the net in several places. Is this a common problem and how does one avoid being accused of nicking it?
A7: Things that are "common knowledge" are not a problem. It's passing off others' work as your own that is unacceptable. Therefore, if your answer merely reflects views that are widely expressed (in papers, on the net, or wherever) that's OK (so long as you acknowledge explicit quotations).
Q8: I obtained some information I needed for my answer by telephoning John Smith, who works for Widgets Ltd. How do I credit the source of this conversation in my paper?
A8: The conversation should be cited in your answer and included in the references as "John Smith (Widgets Ltd), Personal communication, 23 October 2003".
Q9:
Do I have to submit a statement of ethics
on my project?
A9: Yes. This is required for all projects. Please see the project web pages for guidance.
Q10: What is the page limit and does it include the bibliography, or do we get extra space for that?
A10: The page limit is 100 pages
and this includes your bibliography. Please consult your project supervisor
about the use of appendices in a project. A3 pages should not be submitted
unless they are folded in a way that will mean they can be unfolded when heat
binding has occurred. Each A3 sheet will be counted as two A4 sheets.
Q11: how do I submit the project?
A11: Do the following:
Q12: What is the format of the presentation?
A12: It takes the form of a 10 minute talk, followed by 5 minutes of questions, to two examiners. Information is given on the project web pages.
Q13: Do I have to do the presentation in person?
A13: Normally you will be asked to
attend at a session at
Q14:
How is the overall mark derived from the marks allocated to questions a to g in the marking scheme?
A14: The marker looks at the marks for these
questions are makes an evaluation based on them on the overall mark to give. This
is not done by a formula. If the final marks of the two markers are at least 10
marks apart or the marks given are on the boundary of a pass/fail or
distinction/pass grading then a resolution process is followed. If neither of
these conditions hold the two marks are averaged.
Q15: When will I hear about the result of my project?
A15:
After the next Board of Examiners meeting. If you are submitting in September
then this will usually be in November.
Q16:
When will my Master’s conferment
be?
A16: The next available conferment ceremony. For instance, if you submit in September this will normally be in the following January.
About this page
|
Author: |
Mark Nicholson |
|
Email: |
|
|
Creation date: |
15-Dec-2008 |
|
Last updated: |
18-Dec-2008 |