Modular MSc Course Assessments - Frequently Asked Questions
 
About this page

This page contains general advice on how to approach the open assessments that are set for Modular MSc and related courses. The advice here should be followed for all open assessments.

The advice is presented as a set of frequently asked questions with appropriate responses, and is organised into the following sections:

 
General Approach

Q1: I am having great difficulty with the assignment, mainly in interpreting what is required, as this is the first time I have attempted an assignment of this nature.

A1: The best advice we can give is to follow these "golden rules":

  1. We want to see evidence of your thoughts and your understanding. Remember, an assessment is quite different to the sort of reports you may be used to writing for work. It's not something that gets drafted, commented on, updated, reviewed, revised... except by yourself, of course... and what you hand in should reflect your knowledge and understanding as best you can manage.
  2. Ideas, and the expression of those ideas, are far more important than perfect presentation... so spend time on the substance, not the appearance. So long as it's neat and legible, that's sufficient.
  3. A good answer to the paper may require reading beyond what was covered in the course material. You need to get organised to achieve this.
  4. READ the question, THINK about what it's asking, and ANSWER THE QUESTION. No matter how interesting something is, if it doesn't answer the question, there will be no marks for it in the mark scheme. Short but relevant answers will attract more marks than a long, irrelevant essay.
  5. Use the marks for each part of the question as a guide to how much time to spend / space to use writing up your answer. We try very hard to allocate marks according to how much work we think each question entails, so that gives you some clues to our expectations.
  6. If you generate a lot of material, and you think it's all relevant, force yourself to be selective. Which are the key ideas? What are the very best examples? This is particularly important for later assessments, where you may generate a lot of analysis output, for example. In these cases, you may need to include just sufficient of the original material to show your approach, then summarise the key conculsions from the rest of the work.
  7. Leave your answer a couple of days, then re-read it. Is it in good English? Have you managed to express your thoughts coherently? Do you still think it answers the question?

You should also study the marking criteria, which give further details of what the markers are looking for.

 

 
Vocabulary

Q2: I am aware that certain words and phrases have specific meanings when they appear in an assessment question. Can you help me identify these words and understand what they are asking for?

A2: The table below identifies several common "question prompts" and words with special meanings in questions, and explains what they mean.

It is important to note that this table is provided for guidance only. You should always take care to read the assessment paper carefully, and consider how to interpret words in the context in which they appear in the question.

 
Analyse To examine closely
  • Determine (and justify) an appropriate method.
  • Break the subject into parts and investigate each.
  • Connect the parts to reach and justify a conclusion.
Argue To exhibit or prove by reasoning
  • State your position/claim on the subject.
  • List and justify (support with evidence) reasons for your position/claim.
  • Identify objections to your position/claim (or the reasons for your position) and propose defences to these objections.
  • Fill out reasons, objections, and defences with details, examples, consequences, logical connections, and so on.
Apply [an analysis] To use a specific method
  • Work as if you were applying the required analysis technique on a real system.
  • Unless instructed otherwise (or there is a very strong justification), apply the technique as presented in the lectures or in standard reference materials.
  • If you decide it is justifiable to deviate from the standard method, explain your rationale.
  • Be careful to consider advice given in the lectures about good practice and common errors to avoid.
  • If necessary, be selective about which results to present - perhaps a small amount of detailed working to show the approach, then pick out key results.
Brief, briefly (as in "present a brief analysis...") Present key points as concisely as possible

Where a question asks you to provide a brief answer, the correct interpretation is that you should work out the points required for a full answer, and then present the key points. Brief should NOT be interpreted as meaning "do a small part of the task".

For example, "conduct a brief hazard analysis" should be interpreted as "identify ALL the hazards, and present minimal key information about each", NOT as "list the first few hazards that occur to you".

Calculate To determine by mathematical process
  • State given data and assumptions.
  • Identify methods of working (e.g. state whether calculation is exact or using simplifying approximations).
  • Show all working.
Comment To make statements about something
Compare To give similarities and differences of two or more items
  • Make a list of bases for comparing and contrasting.
  • For each basis, judge similarities and differences.
  • Supply details, examples, etc., that will support and clarify your judgement.
  • Assess overall similarity or difference.
  • Determine significance of similarities and difference with respect to the purpose of the comparison.
Consider A synonym for "discuss"  
Criticise To judge the good and bad points of something
  • Make a list of the good points and bad points of the subject.
  • Develop details, examples, contrasts, etc., to support and illustrate your judgements.
  • Make an overall judgement of quality.
Define To state the meaning of (a word etc.); to describe (an entity) precisely
  • If there is an accepted exisiting definition (e.g. from a standard), state that definition and cite the source.
  • Otherwise, state the required facts as clearly and precisely as possible in your own words.
Demonstrate To show something
  • Provide evidence, clarify the logical basis of something, appeal to principles or laws as an explanation.
Describe To set out the qualities or properties of something
  • Pick out highlights or major aspects of the subject.
  • Develop details, illustrations, and the like to give a clear picture.
Develop [an argument...] To bring to light gradually; to work out; to bring from a simple to a complex state
  • State starting point(s) - data provided, known facts etc.
  • Combine facts logically, or extrapolate from known facts, as required.
  • Provide rationale (e.g. to explain your approach) where necessary.
  • Clearly state assumptions and justifications.
Discuss To consider or examine by argument
  • Determine a list of points of discussion (relevant items or issues).
  • Prioritise the points of discussion.
  • Examine each point in turn, using data, references and examples where appropriate to support your position.
  • State and justify the conclusions you reach.
Evaluate To determine the value or worth of, to appraise
  • Determine criteria (goals, ideals) from which you can judge something's worth.
  • Make value judgement (or judgements) based on your criteria.
  • Develop details (examples, evidence) which support your judgement and clarify your reasoning.
Explain To show the causes of or reasons for something   Depending on the subject of the question, either:
  • Show what leads to what in producing something or causing a result, thoroughly presenting details of each step
  or:
  • Make a list of factors that influence something, presenting evidence for each factor's potential influence.
Identify (as in "identify the causes...") To establish, to pinpoint
  • Decide on an appropriate method / technique, state and justify what you are using.
  • Apply the technique systematically.
  • List results, ensuring that items are adequately defined.
Justify To prove or show to be just or right; to show grounds for
  • Explain (a point of view or conclusion); give reasons for; show just cause for; show to be reasonable.
May An option Something you can decide whether or not to do (e.g. "the results may be presented in GSN notation").
Must A requirement Something that it is essential to do, or to include in your answer (e.g. "all working must be shown"). Marks will be allocated for the thing that is required.
Shall A requirement See must.
Should A strong intention Something that it is strongly intended / highly desirable to do, or to include in your answer (e.g. "results should be presented in tabular form"). If you choose not to do this, a justification must be given, otherwise marks may be lost.
State To set forth explicitly in speech or writing
  • Write the required facts as clearly and precisely as possible, with an appropriate degree of formality (e.g. if you are stating a physical quantity, ensure you state the unit of measurement).

 

 
Incomplete Data

Q3: I don't think the question contains all the data I need for a complete answer. Is it best to make something up?

A3: If you find that a question which provides a concrete information (e.g. a description of a system as the basis for a set of tasks) does not include all the information you think you need to complete those tasks, you should state this clearly in your answer.

If data is missing, state what is missing, or use a "place-holder"; do not "invent" data.

For example, in a question which asks you to derive safety requirements for a control system , it may be clear that the control system has to react quickly to shut the system down if there is a problem. If the system description doesn't contain the information you need to calculate the actual reaction speed, it is perfectly acceptable to state "In case of error the control system must shut the system down quickly (time limit TBD)", or "... within X ms (TBD)". Putting in an "invented" figure ("... within 25ms") without justification is not good practice. You would not (or certainly should not) do this for a real system, so don't do it with an assessment example either.

 

 
Citations and References

Q4: What format should I use for references?

A4: The Department's required style for projects is the IEEE style; there is an online guide to using this referencing style, and it is a good idea to use it for open assessments so that you become familiar with it. Note that the cover of the guide says "as used in Electronics"; it is the required format in Computer Science as well, but the decision to adopt it in this Department was made after the guide went to press.

For the 2011/12 academic year, although the IEEE style is preferred, we will not be mandating it for open assessments, and any sensible citation style is acceptable. The "classic" formats are "Numbered" (as per the IEEE) and "Author/Date". In the "Numbered" format, references in the text appear as [12]. In the bibliography, papers are listed numerically in order of appearance in the body of the answer. In the "Author/Date" format, references in the text appear as [Lowson 2001]. If you cite more than one paper publised by the same author in a single year, you use [Lowson 2001a], [Lowson 2001b] etc. If you adopt this style, when you cite a reference, you need not repeat the author's name or authors' names ("Lowson [Lowson 2001] has shown ..."). Write instead: "Lowson [2001] has shown ...". In the bibliography, papers are listed alphabetically by first author.

Q5: Do you prefer a single set of references for the whole assessment, or one set for each question?

A5: A separate set for each question is preferable, as there may be different first and second markers for each question.

Q6: A lot of the material I have put together reflects what already exists on the net in several places. Is this a common problem and how does one avoid being accused of nicking it?

A6: Things that are "common knowledge" are not a problem. It's passing off others' work as your own that is unacceptable. Therefore, if your answer merely reflects views that are widely expressed (in papers, on the net, or wherever) that's OK (so long as you acknowledge explicit quotations).

Q7: I obtained some information I needed for my answer by telephoning John Smith, who works for Widgets Ltd. How do I credit the source of this conversation in my paper?

A7: The conversation should be cited in your answer and included in the references as "John Smith (Widgets Ltd), Personal communication, 23 October 2011".

Q8: Does the page limit include our bibliographies, or do we get extra space for that?

A8: You must include any bibliographies / reference lists within the page limit.

 

 
Format and Presentation

Q9: What are the regulations for formatting of submissions (i.e. font size, spacing, page margins etc.)?

A9: There are no specific regulations governing the format of assessment sumbissions, other than the page limit stated in the question paper, and the requirement to put your student number (and no other form of identification) on each page.

However, you should try to adhere to the following rules:

Q10: Should I include a copy of the original question with each answer?

A10: There is no requirement to include a copy of (any part of) the question paper with your submission. However, quoting a small amount of the text of the sub-questions can be a good idea, as it can help to make it clearer to the marker which part of the question you are answering, and can also make it easier for you to do a final read-through to check that your answer properly addresses the question. If you choose to do this, don't waste space quoting too much.

Q11: Some of my diagrams and tables are very big, and I can't fit them onto A4 paper. Can I use A3?

A11: You can use A3 sized paper - indeed, it is preferable to do so rather than reduce diagrams and tables to a size where text becomes unreadably small - but each A3 sheet will be counted as two A4 sheets.

Q12: I've found a fantastic diagram on the web. Can I include it in my answer?

A12: Provided that material is correcty attributed, this is acceptable. However, unless you directly reference it in your answer, a large picture or diagram that someone else has drawn - no matter how attractive - does not add to your answer. Beware of wasting space that could be used more profitably.

 

 
Submission

Q13: I am going to be in York for another module on the submission date. Can I just hand my paper in to the office, or is it mandatory to post it?

A13: You can hand in the assessment personally to the Departmental Office. The office staff will issue you with a receipt, which you should keep safe. Make sure you hand your paper in on time (i.e. before NOON on the due date).

For non-registered students only, you may submit a soft copy of your assessment in person by burning a CD containing your submission as a single pdf file. The office staff will check that they can read the file, then issue a receipt as for a paper submission.

Registered students who wish to submit electronically must use the online system, even if you are in York on the hand-in date.

Q14: What sort of binder should I put my paper in?

A14: There is no need to submit your assessment in a cover or binder; just make sure all the pages are firmly fixed together (a staple is fine).

 

About this page
Author: David Pumfrey
Email questions to:  David.Pumfrey@cs.york.ac.uk
Creation date: 16-May-2006
Last updated: 4-Oct-2011 Added advice on use of pictures and diagrams and incomplete data